Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In the recent years the growth of competition on every aspect of life leds some to argue that it is better to do competition especially at work, educational institutions and in daily life. While other people think everyone should cooperate. There are strong arguments supporitng both views which I will discuss and at last I will give my opinion.

First and foremost, individuals who think competition is better option rather than cooperation argue that it gives motivation to work hard as it encourages people to put more effort to achieve their goals especially when you know you are in competition with others. They also argue that it improves people performances and their skills when they compete with others. Competition also develops ideas for businesses and individuals for their products and technologies. Furthermore, it also gives confidence to the winners. For instance, when a person is in competition with someone and he win that competition then he will feel alot of confidence which motivates him in the future challenges.Moreover, employees who perform better may receive promotions, salary increases and professional recognition as well.

Secondly, those who believe cooperation with eachother is better than competition argue that teamwork allows people to work effectively together and achieve many things. They also argue that when people work together, they often share their ideas, knowledge and skills which improves their working style. Furthermore, cooperating with eachother also encourages people to build stronger relationships, develop trust, respect and understanding among colleagues. For instance, different people bring different ideas, skills, knowledge, which when combined, bring better results and outcomes.

In conclusion. I believe that working together and cooperating with eachother brings better outcomes and also sharing knowledge benefits both parties rather than just focusing on competitions.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the discussion and give a clear preference for cooperation in the conclusion. The competition paragraph offers relevant reasons, including motivation, improved performance and recognition, while the cooperation paragraph explains how sharing skills and ideas can improve results and relationships. This covers the task, but some points are asserted rather than fully explained. For example, the claim that competition “develops ideas for businesses” is not illustrated or linked clearly to a specific benefit, and the example about a winner gaining confidence largely repeats the point about motivation. To strengthen the response, develop fewer ideas in more depth and explain the conditions under which competition or cooperation is most beneficial. Your final opinion could also be stated more explicitly in the introduction and maintained throughout.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. The sequence within the body paragraphs is generally logical, and signposts such as “First and foremost,” “Furthermore,” and “Secondly” help readers follow the discussion. This shows sound organisation, with some flexibility in linking ideas. However, several transitions are formulaic, and repeated use of “They also argue” and “Furthermore” makes the progression feel somewhat mechanical. The conclusion begins with “In conclusion.” as a sentence fragment, and the final paragraph mostly restates the cooperation argument rather than drawing the two views together. Use a wider range of natural links and clearer references between claims and examples to make the flow more seamless.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of vocabulary for the topic, including “motivation,” “professional recognition,” “teamwork,” “trust,” and “outcomes.” These choices communicate the main ideas, and some phrases show an attempt to be precise. However, noticeable spelling and word-choice errors reduce accuracy, such as “supporitng,” “alot,” and “performances” where “performance” is intended. Some collocations are also unnatural: “do competition,” “in every aspect of life,” and “improves their working style.” Repetition of “cooperate,” “competition,” and “argue” limits flexibility. Aim to learn common word partnerships and check spelling and word forms carefully; for example, describe people as “competing” and say that collaboration “improves the quality of work.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses with “when,” “which,” and “rather than,” and the overall meaning is usually clear. Some sentences are controlled, such as the explanation that people share “ideas, knowledge and skills.” However, errors in verb forms, agreement, articles and punctuation remain noticeable. Examples include “the growth … leds,” “he win,” and “it improves people performances”; these should be corrected to “has led,” “he wins,” and “people’s performance.” The opening also has an incomplete contrast structure: “While other people think everyone should cooperate” needs to be joined to the preceding sentence. Review sentence boundaries and possessive forms, and proofread for agreement. More accurate control of these patterns would make your varied sentence structures easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.