Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-10
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
It is argued that competition need in various spheres of life like school, job or in daily lifewhile other have faith on collaboration. I firmly believe that, though competition makes people more focused on career goal, cooperationmay it create snergy and strong social connection.
The propnents who think competition is crucial among people because it may help individual to be more serious about their study and career and help them to maintain deciplin in life. if the the competition environment is healthy, students of job holders can give concentration on their own task and can finish their work within limited time. For example , in a healthy competitive environment student wants to be the best one therefore they study regularly which help them to be in routine life. Consequently challenges may bring some good habits and assist everyone to be more serious toward their acheivable goals.
On the other side, people who think cooperation is best for everyone because it is a beautiful way of getting good result of any task effeciently and rapidly .When students or individual do anything in a group, they can create snergy. As a group consist of some people, every indivual have own potentiality which actualy helps in solve any critical issue ina faster pace and flexibily. Another reason to support grouping is strong social connection. when people works in a group , sometimes they get emotionaly connected which ultimately create a bond and make the society more strong. For instance, when students complete an assignment in a group it seems more creative than one's indivual work, by working together it also built a relation of friendship.
To conclude, although healthy competion makes people strong and serious, collaboration is far better because it create snergy and good societal interaction.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
You address both sides of the question and state a clear preference for cooperation, especially in the introduction and conclusion. The discussion of competition links it to focus, discipline and goal-setting, while the cooperation paragraph explains shared problem-solving and social bonds; the student-assignment example also supports your view. This meets the task well, but some points are more fully explained than others. For instance, the benefits of competition are mostly described through students, with little development of how it applies at work or in daily life. The claim that group work produces better results could also be explained with a specific example or clearer reasoning. Develop these points further to make the argument more consistently convincing.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a coherent overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion that restates your position. Transitions such as “On the other side” and “To conclude” help readers follow the discussion, and ideas within each paragraph generally relate to its main point. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. The opening sentence is difficult to follow, and the shift from group problem-solving to emotional connection could be signposted more smoothly. Several sentences also contain multiple ideas joined without clear punctuation, which weakens progression. Use clearer topic sentences and make the relationship between each example and its supporting claim explicit; this would make the organisation more consistently controlled.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “competitive environment,” “potentiality,” “social connection” and “societal interaction.” These choices show an effort to discuss both practical and social effects, but inaccurate spelling, word forms and collocations are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause. Examples include “snergy,” “deciplin,” “acheivable goals,” “give concentration” and “create a bond.” Some expressions are also imprecise, such as “beautiful way” and “best for everyone.” Choose more natural academic phrasing and check spelling carefully. For example, “focus on their tasks” is more idiomatic than “give concentration on their own task,” while “build social ties” is clearer than “create a bond.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a concessive opening (“though competition makes people…”) and conditional phrasing (“if the competition environment is healthy”). However, control is limited: errors in sentence structure, agreement, articles and punctuation occur frequently and can make some sentences difficult to process. For example, “students or individual do anything in a group” has agreement and number problems, while “every individual have own potentiality” lacks correct agreement and possessive structure. The opening sentence also contains an incomplete or unclear construction. Practise building accurate subject–verb patterns and checking articles and plurals, then use commas and full stops to separate complete ideas. Greater accuracy in these basic patterns should come before adding more complex clauses.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.