Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is believed that competition in workplace and academic institution is beneficial for betterment of regular activities. Others argue that people should be helpful in their workplace. From my perspective, both statements are equally valid and deserve consideration. But the cooperative mentality towrads peers or colleagues outweigh the advantages of competitive mentality.

The cooperative environment within office or school leads to substantial progress. Individuals could have the opportunities of learning each other. They can share their experience with others. Not only they can learn from their colleagues, but they can handle a big project of their workplace very easily. For instance, the employees of a large company had to deal with international companies, if they haven't enough cohesion between the team member it would be quite difficult to achieve the prospects.

Nevertheless, being a competitor has some positive sides also. First and foremost, it can encourages everyone to provide their quality. Furthermore, this quality helps people not to be dependent on other. As a result, everyone will be responsible for their own activities. A concrete example can be, when a student achieve a recognition of excellent accademic performance its boost up to do better in next exams also. Also, the player of cricket should hav ethe mentality of winning, because they represents their country's to the outer world

In conclusion, competitive environment can bring some positive impacts for individuals. However, the cooperating atmosphere can uphold the entire achievement for institutions. There it is expected to be helpful towards others. To maintain this environment the authorities of the academic institution and workplace should take some necessary steps. Such as, picnic or yearly tour can improve the internal relation between students and employees.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both sides of the discussion and state a clear preference for cooperation, while acknowledging that competition can motivate people to improve and take responsibility. The examples about teamwork on an international project, a student’s academic recognition, and cricket help make the response relevant. This meets the task well, but the ideas are not equally developed: the benefits of cooperation are explained more fully than the reasons competition can be valuable, and the cricket example is asserted rather than connected clearly to its wider benefit. The conclusion also introduces institutional activities such as trips without explaining how they support your argument. Develop each main point with a clearer explanation of its consequences and keep the final recommendation closely tied to your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for cooperation and competition, and a conclusion. Transitions such as “Nevertheless,” “Furthermore,” and “In conclusion” help signal the direction of the argument, and the main ideas generally progress logically. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “First and foremost” is followed by a point that is not fully explained, while “There it is expected to be helpful towards others” is difficult to connect to the preceding conclusion. References such as “this quality” and “it” also leave the reader to infer exactly what is meant. To strengthen progression, make links between claims and examples explicit, and ensure each paragraph ends by reinforcing its central point.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “cooperative environment,” “substantial progress,” “cohesion,” and “competitive mentality.” These choices show an effort to express ideas beyond basic vocabulary. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “provide their quality,” “boost up,” and “uphold the entire achievement.” There are also spelling errors, including “towrads,” “accademic,” and “hav.” These issues sometimes make the intended meaning less precise, even though the overall topic remains understandable. Aim for natural combinations such as “improve the quality of their work” and “motivate them to perform better,” and check spelling and word forms carefully during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use both simple and more complex sentence forms, including the contrastive opening “Not only they can learn…” and a conditional example about team cohesion. This gives the response some structural variety, but errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction remain noticeable. Examples include “it can encourages,” “a student achieve,” and “they represents”; these should be “it can encourage,” “a student achieves,” and “they represent.” The conditional sentence beginning “if they haven't enough cohesion” also needs a more accurate structure, such as “if they do not have enough cohesion.” Some sentences are understandable despite these errors, but greater control is needed. Practise checking subject–verb agreement and verb forms, especially in longer sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.