Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

People have different opinion about whether competition is good thing or cooperate more is more beneficial. While both perspective have their own merits, I believe that cooperate is better. This essay will discuss both viewpoints before explaning my position.

On the one hand, some people argue that competition is suitable. The main reason for this is that competition tell us how much we need to practice to achive our component position. Furthermore, competitions at work helps for posting in corporate life. For example, Many people do competition and achieve big score as compare to their teammates and friends and it will help them to get posting and achievement. Consequently supporters of this view believe that its help too much to keep their score and achievement maintain.

On the other hand some people believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other. One major advantage of this approach is that it maintain the relation with friends and team members. For instance, most of the people do competition with friends which affect on their friendship. I find this argument more convincing because competition always not benefitial for relation. Therefore, cooperate more is good for everything like maintain relationship and workload.

In conclusion, although many people think competition is good for our daily life, I believe that cooperating with others keep relation with them very neat and it is also help to keep our heath well and good which is more beneficial for day to day tasks and performance at work.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address both sides of the question and state a preference for cooperation in the introduction and conclusion. The competition paragraph gives a relevant reason—competition may encourage practice and workplace advancement—while the cooperation paragraph focuses on relationships. However, these ideas remain limited and are not clearly explained: for example, “achieve big score” and “get posting and achievement” do not show precisely how competition benefits people. The claim that cooperation is “good for everything” is also too broad, and the point about health is introduced only in the conclusion. The response is 239 words, so it is 11 words below the 250-word minimum; the 14 words copied from the prompt were not counted. Develop each main reason with a clearer explanation or example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the basic organisation. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear, and several links feel mechanical or repetitive. For instance, the competition paragraph moves from practice to workplace promotion and then to maintaining scores without making the relationship between these points clear. The conclusion repeats the preference for cooperation but adds a new health claim rather than drawing together the reasons already discussed. Use clearer links between each claim and its explanation, and keep the conclusion focused on the essay’s established arguments.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “competition,” “cooperate,” “team members,” and “workload,” so the main subject is generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate word choices or collocations make parts difficult to interpret. Phrases such as “achieve our component position,” “helps for posting,” and “keep their score and achievement maintain” do not express the intended ideas clearly. There are also spelling and word-form errors, including “explaning,” “achive,” and “benefitial.” Aim for precise, natural combinations—for example, describe competition as motivating people to improve or helping employees earn promotion—and check spelling and word forms during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a concession in “While both perspective have their own merits” and a reason clause beginning “because.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to follow. Examples include subject–verb agreement in “competition tell us” and “competitions at work helps,” missing or incorrect articles in “good thing,” and the ungrammatical construction “cooperate is better.” The final sentence also has several problems with verb forms and agreement: “cooperating with others keep relation” and “it is also help.” Practise building accurate subject–verb patterns and checking articles, plurals, and verb forms before adding more complex clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.