Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Many people consider competition in every aspects of life such as at work, at school is a necessary, while others argue that cooperation will be more beneficial. I strongly agree with the latter view because it increase the productivity of a team.

On the one hand, people believe that competition will increase individual's productivity making him successful than others. Competition at work encourages employees to work independently/. As a result, everyone get a chance to try their best to be highlighted to their boss by doing something by their own. Moreover, competitive nature of an individual at work can make significant strategic decision that will eventually bring growth to the company. For example, supervisor in different companies try to create positive competition among the employees while working in a different projects so that they can work hard to get the job done. However, this nature make may have negective on team building. That is why I disagree with this view.

On the other hand, people think cooperative nature in any aspect of life increase the overall productivity through team work. Cooperative nature enables employee to help each other in difficult situations. For example, while working in a project, a junior employee can get the chance to learn new skills if the work culture is cooperative. One major advantage of cooperative work culture is that it creates team building capacity among the employees. Everyone try to work hard to achieve a common goal rather than thinking of himself.

In conclusion, though the competitive nature can make individual more focused to his own goal, cooperative work nature is more crucial to work in a team to achieve a common goal. It makes team bonding strong by developing team building character.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the question and state a clear preference for cooperation in the introduction and conclusion. The discussion of competition includes relevant points about individual effort and possible benefits to a company, while the cooperation paragraph explains peer support, learning and shared goals. These ideas are appropriate, but some are asserted rather than fully explained: for instance, the claim that competition can lead to a “significant strategic decision” is not clearly connected to how an employee’s competition produces that outcome. The example of supervisors creating competition is also general. Develop one or two points with a clearer explanation or a specific illustration, and make the comparison between individual achievement and team outcomes more explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. The signposts “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” make the progression easy to follow, and the ideas within each paragraph generally relate to its main position. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some of the stronger control associated with more flexible cohesion. However, links can feel mechanical, and some references are unclear—for example, “this nature” in the competition paragraph does not precisely identify which aspect of competition is being discussed. Use more varied transitions and connect each example directly to the point it supports.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to discuss both views, including “productivity,” “cooperative,” “team building,” and “common goal.” There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “work culture” and “strategic decision.” However, the range is limited by repeated wording, especially “cooperative nature,” “team,” and “work,” and several choices or forms are inaccurate or unnatural. Examples include “in every aspects,” “a necessary,” “negective,” and “team building capacity.” These do not prevent the main message from being understood, but they reduce precision and fluency. Build a wider set of natural collocations for workplace cooperation and competition, and check spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including a reason clause (“because it increase the productivity of a team”) and a conditional-style explanation beginning “so that.” Most sentences communicate their intended meaning, and the paragraph structure helps the reader follow the argument. Some grammatical errors remain, particularly with subject–verb agreement, articles, plurals and sentence construction. For example, “everyone get” should be “everyone gets,” and “cooperative nature … increase” needs a singular verb. The opening phrase “in every aspects of life” also has a number error, while “a junior employee can get the chance” uses an awkward article pattern. Review agreement and article use, and edit complex sentences to ensure each clause is complete and accurate.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.