Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Competition in daily life, in studies and in jobs is a positive thing and a minority of individuals believe that. However, A majority disagreed with this statement and they are concern about cooperation more rather than competing , and I personaly appreciate their thoughts. In this essay, I will discuss both view and explain my perspective before drawing a conclusion.

On the one hand, indivisuals imagine that competition is essential in every sector for the growth of this generation. This is because they are more focused and self-oriented about their career. They believe that, this is a way how they could inhance their personal growth. As a direct consequence, they always forcus on their needs and improvement rather thand focusing on all of the citizens. Mostly our young generation are focused on this.

In contrast, A majority of people believe in cooperation instead of compiting. From their views, we should work on every simple individuals and it's the proper way of being successfull. They ensure everyone is doing good in their life, try to help each other. Consequently, it leads to a positive atmosphare and efficient growth in every single sector. They believe that working as a team is more beneficial and crucial and I totally agree with their thoughts.

From my perspective, the outcome from working as a team is more benefited and worthy than compiting with each others. If we are able to give people a hand whenever they need, It's makes our life more easier and helps to grow us fast toghether. In my classroom, I always helped my friends whenever they needed me and till now I'm always available for them. Whatever, right now I'm working with my colleagues and developing my personal and professional skills by cooperating with them properly.

Lastly, we are living toghether for a healthy and sound life. Competiton mostly make our relationships weak and its create dissatisfaction and mental issues. On the other side, cooperation makes our life more calm and hessel free.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the discussion and make your position clear: you favour cooperation, stating, “I totally agree with their thoughts.” The response also gives relevant examples from classroom and workplace experience, which helps connect the argument to real situations. However, the two views are not developed equally. The case for competition is mainly described as helping individuals focus on career and personal growth, without explaining how this benefits workplaces or society. The cooperation argument is clearer, but claims such as cooperation making life “more calm” and competition causing mental issues need explanation or a specific example. To strengthen the response, develop each side with a reason and a concrete consequence, then make the comparison in your conclusion more precise.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, a personal example, and a concluding paragraph. Signposts such as “On the one hand,” “In contrast,” and “From my perspective” help readers follow the discussion. However, the progression is somewhat mechanical, and the final two paragraphs repeat the preference for cooperation rather than building a new concluding synthesis. Some references are also unclear, such as “they” in “they are more focused” and “their thoughts,” where the groups being discussed could be identified more explicitly. Improve cohesion by linking each example directly to the claim it supports and by using the conclusion to summarise the comparison rather than restating similar points.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “personal growth,” “cooperation,” “professional skills,” and “positive atmosphere,” so the main ideas are generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate word choices, collocations, and spelling errors make the expression less natural. Examples include “more benefited,” “being successfull,” “hessel free,” and “compiting”; “every simple individuals” is also unclear. Repetition of “cooperation,” “growth,” and “focused” limits flexibility. Aim to learn topic-specific phrases in context and check spelling and word forms carefully. More precise expressions such as “mutual support,” “career development,” and “a more harmonious environment” would help communicate your ideas clearly and naturally.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mixture of simple and complex sentences, including cause-and-effect structures such as “This is because…” and “Consequently, it leads to…”. Most of the argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make relationships between ideas difficult to follow. For example, “A majority disagreed … and they are concern” shifts tense and has an incorrect verb form; “If we are able to give people a hand …, It’s makes” has faulty clause punctuation and verb structure. There are also agreement and sentence-boundary problems, as in “Mostly our young generation are focused on this.” Practise checking subject–verb agreement, verb forms, and sentence boundaries, and revise complex sentences to ensure each clause is complete and correctly connected.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.