Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In the modern world, competition is an inseparable part of the persons daily life including work and school. Encouraging competition can help an individual to give their maximum efforts whereas teamwork can be improved by cooperating with each other. The main purpose of the forthcoming paragraphs is to put forward both sides of the argument comprehensibly and to elaborate why I chose cooperating rather than competition.

Competition at the every level of a human life, always make them to remember to stay focused and give their all efforts towards the task given to them without being lazy. They will start to take the work as granted if they achieve something without putting their soul into it and sense of achievement will not be felt by the person. For instance, if the person gets the promotion without being inlvoved in any part of the project that was given to him, that person will not value this upgrade given to him.

Contrary to the above justification, if we put competition aside for a second and try to understand the people judgement regarding the specific task or topic, it will help to achieve the teamwork. By working together, one can able to see different perspective which will help to have gain quality work in short period of time. To exemplify, if difficult task is given to the team they will complete it in a shorter duration as compared to a single person.

To write down my final thoughts, even though competition helps to understand about giving their whole into the task whereas I inclined towards cooperating more as it is more useful to carry out work in shorter period.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the discussion and state a clear preference for cooperation, particularly in the introduction and conclusion. The competition paragraph gives a relevant reason—that competition can encourage effort—and illustrates it with a promotion example. The cooperation paragraph also explains how different perspectives can improve teamwork. However, the two views are not developed equally: the competition example focuses more on valuing a promotion than on how competition benefits people, and the cooperation example mainly claims that a team finishes faster. Explain the mechanisms and consequences more fully, and make your opinion more explicit in the body as well as the conclusion. This would make the response more complete and persuasive.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a concluding opinion. The progression from competition to cooperation is easy to follow, and signposts such as “For instance” and “To exemplify” help introduce examples. This meets the expectation of a coherent arrangement. Some linking is nevertheless mechanical or imprecise: “Contrary to the above justification” suggests a direct contradiction, although the next paragraph presents a different perspective, and “To write down my final thoughts” is an awkward transition. The conclusion also compresses the comparison into one sentence. Use more natural transitions and connect each example explicitly to the point it supports to make the progression smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “inseparable part,” “sense of achievement,” “teamwork,” and “different perspective,” so the main ideas are generally understandable. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “put forward both sides of the argument.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, including “take the work as granted,” “give their all efforts,” and “carry out work in shorter period.” The misspelling “inlvoved” also reduces accuracy. These noticeable issues make expression less precise and fluent. Focus on learning common word partnerships and checking spelling; more natural phrasing would help you express the same ideas with greater clarity.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional example beginning “if the person gets the promotion” and a contrast clause in the conclusion. Meaning is usually recoverable, but some grammatical errors affect accuracy. For example, “Competition … always make” has a subject–verb agreement error, while “at the every level” and “if difficult task is given” show article problems. In “one can able to see,” the modal construction is incomplete, and the long opening sentence has an unclear grammatical relationship between its ideas. Work on agreement, articles, and complete verb patterns, and divide or reshape sentences when their clauses do not connect clearly. This will make your varied structures more controlled.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.