Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

A certain proportion of people believe that competing with other person at work, at school and day to day life is a beneficial thing.Others think that people should try to cooperate with each other rather than competing against each other.I also support that cooperate with each other is bettern than competing.

first, those people who think that competition in any stage of life is good thing for people is just because they believe that a person become more mature through these comepetitions.For instance, after lossing any task or a game they learn new things from that task which,they can directly apply into they life.Sometimes these competiton is important for people to fight against their fear of not being able to good in things they like the most.

Second, people who support cooperative environment rather than competing is just because they understand the needs and wants of world better than any thing.For example, sometime people become rivals to each other just because of competing mind-set.There is other reason as well having cooperate mind-set give benefits to each other , it is not like competive which is benifical for onw person and even for work place.

In conclusion, both sides have advantages and disadvantages. They are right in their place to explain the situations. From my side i still go for cooperate thing rather than competing.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address both views and state your preference for cooperation, so the response is relevant to the question. The competition paragraph gives reasons about maturity, learning from failure and facing fears; the cooperation paragraph mentions rivalry and shared benefits. However, these points are brief and are not explained with enough detail or a specific example, and the conclusion mostly repeats your position rather than drawing the discussion together. The comparison between the two sides is also limited, so the response only partially develops the task. The response contains 224 words, which is 26 words below the required minimum. To strengthen your answer, explain how each view affects people in a concrete setting and develop your own opinion with a clear reason.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. The sequence from competition to cooperation is easy to follow, and signposts such as “For instance” and “In conclusion” help identify the stages of the argument. However, progression within paragraphs is less clear: the competition paragraph moves from maturity to learning and then fear without showing how these points connect, while the cooperation paragraph combines rivalry and mutual benefits in a confusing way. Some linking is mechanical, particularly “first” and “Second,” and the conclusion repeats the earlier preference. Use clearer topic sentences and connect each example directly to the claim it supports.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “competition,” “cooperate,” “rivals,” “mind-set” and “benefits,” and the reader can generally understand your main ideas. However, the range is limited and several word choices, forms and spellings are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “comepetitions,” “lossing,” “competiton,” “benifical” and “onw person.” Phrases such as “cooperate thing” and “good in things” are also imprecise, which sometimes makes the meaning difficult to follow. Build a more accurate set of topic expressions and check spelling and collocations. For example, use “cooperative approach” rather than “cooperate thing,” and “improve at activities” rather than “good in things.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentences, including a reason-and-example structure beginning “For instance” and a contrast introduced by “rather than.” However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently in sentence construction, verb forms, agreement, articles and punctuation. Examples include “a person become more mature,” “they can directly apply into they life,” and “I also support that cooperate with each other is bettern.” The opening also runs two sentences together without a space after the full stop, and “first” and “i” are not capitalised appropriately. These errors sometimes make the reader work to understand your meaning. Practise accurate basic clauses first, then add complex structures while checking subject–verb agreement and pronoun forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.