Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-12
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The race of competition is prevalent nowadays. Some people argue that competition is a good thing to discouraged others at workplace, at study centre and in daily life. While, others claim that people should try to cooperate more, instead of competing against each other. I agree with the latter sentiment because cooperation with each other brings happiness and makes a strong society. While, in competition, people sometimes adopt false way to reach their goals.
On the one hand, cooperation with people opens a new way of happiness. People attracts towards kindness and look after each other in an uphill tasks. This can create a sense of truth and make a resilient union in the time of difficulties. For example, In 2015, NASA issued a post on instagram to cooperate with other companies of world in order to make them strong and enhance their progress. As a result. this fraternity raise the value of reliability and provide a significant amount of benefits to individuals and society.
On the other hand, some people argue that creating competitions in every field of life is a good approach. They want to make discourage others and try to achieve their milestones by hook or by crook. This can lead to harm people physically and mentally. For instance, in pakistan, parents provoke their children in several ways to compete others. This can bring bad effects to society and mostly children choose a false way to compete their peers in every aspect of life. Hence, this may affect their intellectual and creative skills and also creates problems for them.
In conclusion, some people find competition as a good way in the place where people work , at institutions and in daily life, while others try to bring harmony by cooperation. I belive that cooperation is a best approach to make people happy and trustworthy.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both views and state a consistent preference for cooperation, explaining that it can promote happiness and social unity, while competition may encourage harmful behaviour. The examples about parents pressuring children and the possible effects on their creativity are relevant to the discussion. However, the cooperation argument is less fully explained: the NASA example is difficult to connect to the claim, and the point about “a sense of truth” is unclear. The discussion of competition also focuses mainly on its harms, rather than explaining why supporters see it as beneficial—for example, how it might motivate people or improve performance. Develop both sides more evenly and make each example clearly demonstrate the point it supports.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for cooperation and competition, and a conclusion that restates your view. Signposting such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the discussion. However, some links between ideas are abrupt or unclear. For example, the NASA example is followed by “As a result,” but the relationship between the post and the claimed benefits is not established. The opening sentence of the competition paragraph also shifts quickly from describing supporters’ views to saying they want to discourage others. Use clearer references and explain the connection between each claim and its example; this would make the progression less mechanical and more convincing.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “cooperate,” “resilient union,” “milestones,” and “intellectual and creative skills,” and your meaning is generally understandable. There are, however, several inaccurate or unnatural word choices and collocations that reduce precision. “The race of competition” is awkward, “a false way” does not naturally express dishonest methods, and “compete their peers” is not the usual construction. “Fraternity” also seems an imprecise choice for the sense of cooperation you intend. Aim for natural combinations such as “the pressure to compete,” “resort to dishonest methods,” and “compete with their peers.” More precise vocabulary would help your ideas sound clearer and more academic.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “because,” “while,” and “in order to,” and the overall meaning can usually be followed. Some grammatical errors remain, particularly in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence boundaries. For example, “People attracts” should have a plural verb, while “this fraternity raise” also needs subject–verb agreement. In “cooperation is a best approach,” the article is incorrect, and “While, in competition” is an incomplete sentence. Punctuation is also inconsistent, as in “As a result. this fraternity.” Review sentence boundaries and check that subjects agree with their verbs. Greater control of these patterns would make your varied sentence attempts more accurate.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.