Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

It is often argued by some people that competition at work,at school is a good thing as it enhance the performance of the students.meanwhile othe beleive that cooperate more than competing however i beleive that competition at work or school should be given priority on the othe hand the supporter of competition at schoo or work beleive that it would it would increase the performance everyone should try their best to win the task take an examle of punjab college competition increase the performance of the student from the last year final year result while on the other hand the supporter of we should cooerate more rather than competing beleive that cooperate more is the best beacuse in competing everyone focus on their on goal they did not help other in cooperate everone help each other and the tast can be perform easily htake an example of sugar mill where everone cooperate and they perform their task easily however,i beleive that competitio at school or work is beeter as it encourage the people to do best from the other and the overall performance result will increase as everone try to take lead from the others to sumup competition at work or at school increase the overall performance while cooperate wille make the work easy but from my prospective competition should be given top priority

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You discuss both sides and state a preference for competition, so the response addresses the main parts of the question. The examples of Punjab College and a sugar mill also show an attempt to support each view. However, the ideas remain limited and under-developed: the college example says performance improved but does not explain how competition produced that result, while the sugar-mill example is only briefly linked to cooperation. Your position is present, but it is repeated rather than fully justified. The response also falls 26 words short of the required minimum, leaving less space to explain your reasons. Develop each example with a specific explanation and make the comparison behind your opinion clearer.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

There is a recognisable overall order: you introduce the debate, present the case for competition, consider cooperation, and conclude with your preference. Linking expressions such as “on the other hand” and “however” help signal these shifts. However, progression is difficult to follow because the response is presented as one long, loosely connected sequence rather than clearly separated paragraphs. Several transitions are repeated or used awkwardly, and the opening sentence combines the two views without a clear boundary. The conclusion also repeats earlier claims instead of drawing them together. Use one paragraph for each view and a separate conclusion, and connect each example directly to the point it supports.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the basic discussion, including “competition,” “cooperate,” “performance,” and “priority.” Some phrases, such as “take the lead,” also show an attempt to express the argument more specifically. However, the range is limited and several words or phrases are repeated, particularly “performance,” “everyone,” and “cooperate.” Spelling and word-choice errors, including “beleive,” “cooerate,” and “take an examle,” make parts of the response harder to read. Some expressions are also unnatural, such as “do best from the other.” Build a wider set of accurate collocations for discussing achievement, teamwork, and outcomes, and proofread spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts to express reasons and contrast, including clauses beginning with “as” and “while,” and it communicates a general preference. However, the range of sentence structures is limited, and attempts to combine several ideas often produce faulty sentences. For example, “as it enhance the performance” has a subject–verb agreement error, while “everyone focus on their on goal” has agreement and sentence-pattern problems. Missing sentence boundaries and punctuation also make the long stretches difficult to interpret. Practise writing shorter, complete sentences first, then combine related ideas using accurate subordinate clauses. Check subject–verb agreement, articles, and punctuation before submitting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.