Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-13
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
People have different opinions regarding competition at work, education and in everyday life. While a great number of people claim that it is important to compete with your colleague and classmates, others argue that individuals should be more cooperative to their co-workers. From my perspective being cooperative should receive greater attention because it rise success rate and develop relationships.
On the one hand, some individuals believe that competing with your classmate, colleague is beneficial, as it makes people more hard worker. The main rationale behind this is that people wanted to do better performance in their work, so they work hard to achieve good result. For example, a student may work hard to compete their class mate to become first. Moreover, competition encourage people to achieve their goal. Therefore, advocates of this view suggest that competition make people competitive and hard working.
On the other hand, opponents of this view argue that cooperation is more beneficial because it increase the success rate. This is mainly because when people discuss about a issue with their mates they find different perspective and different solution for the problems. As a result they can deal with different challenges easily. For instance, when a student find any topic challenging, if they discuss with teacher and friends they may fine easier solution. Furthermore, by cooperation people can make friendship stronger. For this reason i personally support this view because it develop bonding and make work easier, which make it more convincing than the alternative.
In conclusion, although competition may enable people to reach their goal, i firmly believe that cooperation is more effective because it strengthen the relationships and grew the success.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
You address both sides of the question and state a clear preference for cooperation in the introduction, body and conclusion. The competition paragraph gives relevant reasons—working harder and pursuing goals—and the cooperation paragraph explains how discussion can produce different perspectives and solutions. These points meet the task well, but some are asserted rather than fully developed: the example of a student trying to come first does not show the wider effects of competition, while the cooperation example could explain more specifically how collaboration improves an outcome. To strengthen the response, extend each main idea with a clearer consequence or a more detailed example, while maintaining the balanced discussion and consistent position already present.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposting such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” makes the progression easy to follow, and examples are placed alongside the relevant arguments. However, some linking is mechanical, with repeated “Moreover,” “Therefore,” and “For this reason,” and the final sentence of the cooperation paragraph combines several claims without a smooth progression. References such as “this view” can also be vague because the paragraph discusses multiple points. Use a wider range of transitions and make links between claims more explicit; this would build on the sound organisation already achieved.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “competition,” “cooperative,” “success rate,” “perspective,” and “challenges.” There are also attempts at more specific expressions, such as “achieve their goal” and “strengthen relationships.” However, noticeable word-choice and collocation problems limit precision: “more hard worker,” “do better performance,” “compete their class mate,” and “discuss about a issue” are not natural forms. Repetition of “people,” “work hard,” and “beneficial” also makes the vocabulary range feel restricted. Learn common word partnerships and vary repeated terms—for example, use “perform better,” “compete with classmates,” and “discuss an issue”—so your meaning sounds more fluent and exact.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including clauses with “while,” “because,” “when,” and “if,” and the overall meaning remains understandable. Some sentence patterns are handled successfully, such as “when people discuss… they find different perspective,” though the noun phrase needs grammatical correction. Errors occur in verb agreement and forms: “it rise,” “competition encourage,” “it increase,” and “it strengthen” should use third-person singular forms. There are also article, plural and punctuation issues, including “a issue,” “different perspective,” and inconsistent capitalisation of “I.” These errors do not generally prevent understanding, but they reduce accuracy. Review subject–verb agreement and articles, then proofread each sentence for complete, correctly punctuated structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.