Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Some argue that competition at daily life is a positive thing than cooperation. Others argue vice-versa. This essay will discuss both views before proving an opinion.

Competition is not a new concept to life. It is however decide who takes the advantage in life. Competition decide the most common approach to decide the strongest and intelligence among people. In a school, exams is one of the way compete among the colleagues. The person with higher intelligence scores the higher marks than others. In a sport competition, strongest person most likely to win the competition. Therefore, this process assists people to do decide which one is good at what.

On the other hand, cooperation influence people to care about each other. Moreover, it helps people to create bond with their others. Life is a marathon, not a sprint. Therefore, bonds among colleagues, support from others could support our life to be easier than it is. For instance, during a hard time in life, friends and families spread love and support to ease the process. Funeral is a prime example for this. Because of cooperation of others, someone can move on with life, rather than dwelling on the past. Cooperation is important for human survival.

In conclusion, Competition and cooperation is both are important for life. However, in my opinion cooperation have the upper hand among the two. It promotes love and bonds with each other rather than competing for each and every day. In an ideal world, competition would benefit the society. Unfortunately, we are far from perfect.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the question and state a clear preference for cooperation in the conclusion. The examples of exams and sport explain how competition can identify strengths, while the discussion of friends and family supporting someone through bereavement illustrates cooperation. These points are relevant, but they are not equally developed: the competition paragraph mainly describes how winners are identified, without explaining broader benefits such as motivation or improved performance. The cooperation paragraph gives a more personal example, though the link between funeral support and cooperation could be explained more precisely. Your opinion is clear at the end, but it would be stronger if introduced earlier and supported consistently throughout the essay. Develop each main claim with a fuller explanation and a specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. The contrastive opening of the second body paragraph and signals such as “Moreover,” “For instance,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the discussion. This coherent arrangement meets the lower-band expectations, and the paragraphing is generally effective. To make progression more consistently smooth, clarify how each example supports the paragraph’s central claim. For instance, the funeral example is relevant to mutual support, but its connection to cooperation could be made explicit. Some linking is also mechanical, particularly the repeated use of “Therefore” and the formulaic announcement that the essay will discuss both views. Use a wider range of natural transitions and clearer references between ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough vocabulary to discuss both sides, including relevant terms such as “competition,” “cooperation,” “colleagues,” “support,” and “survival.” Phrases such as “Life is a marathon, not a sprint” add some variety, and the meaning is generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several word combinations are inaccurate or unnatural, including “competition at daily life,” “the strongest and intelligence,” and “create bond with their others.” Repetition of “competition,” “life,” and “support” also limits flexibility. Aim to learn vocabulary in natural collocations and check whether a word fits its grammatical form and context. More precise expressions for the benefits of competition and cooperation would help you explain your ideas with greater clarity.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including contrast and cause-and-effect structures, and most of the argument remains understandable. However, errors recur in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction. For example, “Competition decide” should use a singular verb, while “exams is one of the way” has problems with agreement and number. The conclusion’s “Competition and cooperation is both are important” combines incompatible structures, and “cooperation have” also needs subject–verb agreement. These errors sometimes make the reader pause, which limits grammatical control. Practise checking each sentence for a clear subject and verb, then review agreement and singular/plural forms. Build accuracy in straightforward sentences before adding more complex clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.