Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-08-05
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Whether children should adapt competitive behavior or corporative has been a topic for debate. While some people believe that competition is necessary in school and daily life, others argue that children should follow corporation. This essay will discuss both perspectives before explaining why both are required for career growth.
On one hand, competition with fellow mates can inculcate enthusiasm in learning. In school, students compete against each other for higher grades and scholarship, while at work employes compete for promotions and recognition. Conversely, this behavior can motivate individuals to achieve their goals substantially performing actively.
On the other hand, corporation with each other can build a morally ethical personality. For example, in school students can do best with their group projects by sharing the knowledge. Meanwhile at work, employees can induce skills like communication, team working and problem-solving skills which may increase relative productivity of work.
In my opinion, one should always consider competition has motivation or to frame a goal and corporation has a mutual understanding of complexity at work. Moreover, a healthy competition should be implemented among themselves, excessive competition can lead to a rivalry and lack of trust. Meanwhile corporative trait can build a stronger relationship and work morals.
In conclusion, both competitive and corporation have their own benefits in building individual personality, but people should always consider it in healthy way not in an aggressive manner. Competition can be positive approach only when individual apply it for career growth, while corporation indulge priority for building network and strengthening ethical values and overall teams' productivity than individual.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The essay addresses all parts of the prompt by discussing both competition and cooperation and providing a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, though the development is somewhat superficial. For instance, the argument for competition is supported by general examples like 'promotions and recognition,' but these could be expanded with more specific detail to reach a higher band. The position is consistent throughout, and the conclusion effectively synthesizes the two views. To improve, ensure that the supporting points are more thoroughly explored rather than just stated, which would provide a more comprehensive response to the task requirements.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the different viewpoints. Cohesive devices such as 'On one hand,' 'Conversely,' and 'In conclusion' are used to guide the reader through the argument. However, some transitions are slightly mechanical, and there is a minor issue with referencing (e.g., 'corporation' is used where 'cooperation' is intended, which affects the flow). Overall, the progression of ideas is clear, and the structure supports the central argument effectively.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but there are persistent errors in word choice and word formation. The most significant issue is the repeated use of 'corporation' instead of 'cooperation' or 'cooperative,' which is a lexical error that impacts precision. Other phrases like 'induce skills' and 'frame a goal' are slightly unnatural in this context. While the student attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary, the lack of precision in word choice prevents a higher score. Expanding the range of synonyms and focusing on correct collocations would significantly improve the quality of the writing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay displays a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'whether children should adapt competitive behavior or corporative' (should be 'adopt' and 'cooperative') and 'individual apply it' (should be 'individuals apply it'). Punctuation is generally functional, but there are occasional slips that slightly disrupt the reading flow. While the errors do not impede communication, they are frequent enough to prevent the essay from reaching the 7.0 band. Focusing on subject-verb agreement and the correct use of parts of speech would be beneficial.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.