Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-03
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Nowadays, some people argue that competitions is beneficial. in all aspects of life. while some people believe that we should cooperate more, rather than competing against other. in my opnion, while competition has more advantages. cooperate is pay vital role for society.
on the one hand, there are several advantages of competition at work at scool. firstly, at school between students should be competition because they are learn things fastly to see others. however, teachers held competition pupils in various activities such as, speech competition and any projects. for instance, competition motivates people, motivates quailty of works. students compete for top grades, so they study harder. competition is good for youngester. through competition individuals develop your skills. educater held english language competition between students.
On the other hands, cooperate is very vital for communities when citizens cooperate each other so oue society is peaceful and calm. in the modern era individuals should cooperate others such as, collegaes, class fellow and family members. through cooperate we work in the team form. for example, when people cooperate own circule people say own problems this reason reduced stress people feel relax. In a Hospital doctors and nurses cooperate to save patience. every where balance is needed.
In conclusion, although both are important, and many benefits of both. In my opnion cooperation is more important in modern society. through cooperate individuals share own problems other. Students and employee learn new thing through cooperate because people be polite each others. This is positive aspect for community.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited and repetitive. For instance, the argument for competition relies on general statements like 'students study harder' without exploring the nuance of how competition might negatively impact mental health or collaboration. Similarly, the points regarding cooperation are somewhat superficial. While the prompt is addressed, the supporting arguments lack depth and specific, well-integrated examples, which prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. The position is consistent, but the overall development is basic.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate. For example, 'On the other hands' is grammatically incorrect, and the transition 'In this reason' is awkward. Referencing is sometimes unclear, such as in the sentence 'through cooperate individuals share own problems other.' The progression of ideas is present but feels disjointed due to the frequent grammatical errors and the lack of sophisticated linking words. Paragraphing is used, but the internal flow within paragraphs needs more logical connectors to improve readability.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is limited and often repetitive. The student frequently uses the word 'cooperate' or 'competition' in various forms, but struggles with word formation (e.g., 'cooperate' used as a noun instead of 'cooperation', 'educater' instead of 'educators', 'patience' instead of 'patients'). There is little evidence of less common lexical items or idiomatic language. While the meaning is generally clear, the frequent errors in word choice and word form indicate a limited range that is just sufficient for the task but lacks the precision required for higher bands.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The essay contains a high frequency of grammatical errors that occasionally impede communication. There are consistent issues with subject-verb agreement ('teachers held competition', 'cooperate is pay vital role'), article usage, and sentence structure ('they are learn things fastly'). Complex structures are attempted but are almost always inaccurate, such as 'when citizens cooperate each other so oue society is peaceful'. Simple sentences are more frequent, but even these contain errors. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with misplaced commas and capitalization issues throughout the text.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.