Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Some people believe that it is beneficial if individuals have some challenges in their daily lifestyles at working platforms or at school level. However, critics argue that instead of competing against each other, people should have to co-operate with each other. This essay will discuss both the perspective and explains why I believe co-operation is more important in today's generation, although competition is necessary in some cases.

On the one hand, there are numerous reason behind this viewpoint who believe that competition is mandatory at work, school or in daily routine because it make individual a good competent in future. In order to built strong status in working sites or at school, one should compete at higher level to show their intelligence. For instance, for taking seats in public universities in every countries, students have to clear entrance exams, which is totally the one key for taking admission. So, individual starts competing in daily life, often sets shorter milestones in working platforms or in schools, which makes them good competent in future.

On the other hand, those who believe that cooperation is more important rather than competition because it is observed in today's generation that kindness and quality of helping others gets disappear abruptly. Once they started

Competing against each other, they set their boundaries and doesnot show any interest in group activities. For instance, in school academics students learn competition but with sports or co-curriculum activities they learn co-operation . Although, in work-life employees in order to get promotion , they devote their crucial time and do hard work which is totally good but work with co-operation is necessary if they genuinely wants to uplift their company's status at national level. Hence, with sharing their views and co-operation a friendly bond develop between people which is more crucial than being self-centered by doing competition.

In conclusion, it is good for every individual to have challenges in daily life but excessive competition make them self-centered although it is necessary in some cases. It is suggested that by doing co-operation which helps to make eco-friendly bond and friendly environment at work or school.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The essay addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, such as the mention of entrance exams for competition and the benefits of teamwork in a corporate setting. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat superficial. For example, the explanation of why competition makes one a 'good competent' is repetitive and lacks depth. To reach a higher band, you should expand on your examples with more specific analysis rather than just stating that something is 'good' or 'necessary'. The position is consistent throughout, but the supporting arguments could be more thoroughly explored to fully meet the requirements of a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. You use some cohesive devices like 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion' to signal the structure. However, the flow within paragraphs is sometimes hindered by awkward phrasing and mechanical transitions. For instance, the sentence 'Once they started Competing against each other, they set their boundaries and doesnot show any interest in group activities' lacks smooth logical progression. Additionally, some referencing is slightly unclear, and the use of cohesive devices feels a bit repetitive. Improving the variety of linking words and ensuring smoother transitions between sentences would enhance the coherence.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is adequate for the task but lacks precision and variety. You rely on basic terms like 'good', 'important', and 'necessary' repeatedly. There are also some issues with word choice and collocation, such as 'good competent' (which is not standard English) and 'working platforms' instead of 'workplaces'. While the meaning is generally clear, the lack of more sophisticated or academic vocabulary limits the score. To improve, try to incorporate more precise synonyms and idiomatic collocations related to the topic of professional and academic environments.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede the flow. Common issues include subject-verb agreement ('it make individual', 'individual starts', 'doesnot show'), article usage ('in every countries'), and awkward phrasing ('there are numerous reason behind this viewpoint who believe'). While the meaning is usually understandable, these persistent errors prevent the writing from being considered accurate. You should focus on proofreading for basic subject-verb agreement and pluralization to improve your control over simple and complex sentence forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.