Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

As we know that Nowadays,the generation has significantly changed often compared than previously time.One of the most crucial part of present time to reside is being competition among most of individuals.However some community argue that we should strive to cooperate more,rather than competing against each other.

One the one hand,being competing in different fields such as work,at school and in daily life have a paramount benefits to the people who usually tend to offer their indeed effort on related fields.We can easily get various types of opportunity through competition.Being patient and punctual at right situation is also decent acquire for compitetors. Competing against each other would extremely teaches lession about time management,hard working and being labourish in real area.I think,it is one of the most accurate and essential way to demonstrate our hidden ability.

However,some individuals argue that we should attempt to cooperate enormous,rather than competing against each other.I think,it represents more ego and hurt each other among the compitetors.It discourages our motivation,time patient morever waste of time.To illustrate,If we started to competing each other afterwards we have become awful person among those who participants in the following competition.Some time it might less effective rather than direct competition.Although,it will be also an effective option to include following fields according to the cooperate instead of being direct competition.

After analysing this following data we can easily claim that Competition at work,at school and in daily life is a good way in right generation rather than try to cooperate more each other.I advocate all of them that be compitetors and learn more than more positive excepts.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both the benefits of competition and the arguments for cooperation, while also stating a personal opinion. The position is generally clear throughout the essay. However, some ideas are under-developed and lack extension. For instance, the writer states that competition teaches time management and hard work, but does not elaborate with a concrete example. The body paragraphs tend to generalize rather than fully explore the nuances of both viewpoints. Furthermore, the final paragraph introduces minor confusion with phrasing such as 'positive excepts'. Consequently, the performance aligns best with the Band 6 descriptors, as all parts of the prompt are addressed, but the depth of development is limited.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear attempt at paragraphing, separating the introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, cohesion is frequently faulty and mechanical. The writer over-uses basic cohesive devices and punctuation errors disrupt the flow, such as missing spaces after commas and periods throughout the text (e.g., 'Nowadays,the generation'). Referencing is occasionally unclear, particularly in the third paragraph where pronouns and transitions like 'afterwards we have become awful person' obscure the logical progression. Paragraphing is present, but the internal logical links between sentences can be repetitive. These issues place the response firmly in the Band 5 category for cohesion.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The lexical resource is limited and displays noticeable errors that frequently cause difficulty for the reader. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary such as 'paramount benefits', 'punctual', and 'demonstrate our hidden ability', but these are often accompanied by severe word-choice and collocation inaccuracies, such as 'decent acquire for compitetors' and 'cooperate enormous'. There are also frequent spelling and morphological errors, including 'compitetors', 'lession', and 'labourish'. While the vocabulary is minimally adequate to convey a basic argument, the accumulation of lexical errors prevents the score from reaching a higher band, making Band 5 an appropriate evaluation.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The grammatical range is restricted, relying on a mix of simple and somewhat complex sentence forms, though attempts at complex structures are frequently faulty. There are persistent errors in grammar, punctuation, and article usage, such as 'previously time', 'present time to reside is being competition', and 'If we started to competing each other'. Subject-verb agreement and prepositional use are also problematic throughout the response (e.g., 'cooperate more,rather than competing', 'competing each other'). Although the meaning can usually be deciphered despite these hurdles, the high frequency of errors places the grammar squarely at Band 5.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.