Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-16

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In today's contemporary world, there is a debate about competition and cooperation are two fundamentals’ aspects of human interaction that plays an important role in education, employment and everyday life. While some people argue that competition helps individuals to be perform better, others believe that cooperation is more beneficial for achieving common goals. This essay will discuss both views before providing my opinion.

On one hand, competitive environment has been widely supported for several reasons. Firstly, it helps pushes people to be work harder and improve their performance in every aspect of life. For example, a student in any class is having some low grades than other smarter student and he will study harder to improve his grades to be better in his studies to achieve his desired goals. Secondly, prepare people for real life, since the job market is itself more competitive. This suggests that to bring motivation and for foster more better skills to use in their everyday life it is a necessary demand. Therefore, many people believe that having rivalry in your everyday tasks is the most beneficial approach.

On the other hand, there are those who argue that teamwork is an essential part for the daily aspects. One of the main reasons is that it produces better results for situation like complex problems and coordination could help them in solving those complications. For example, medical research teams investing in their time to produce some better results to overcome the desired obstacle, while doing work in coordination they will get better results instead of individual’s researching on them. Additionally, it builds more trust and relationship between colleagues and teammates. Such as, university projects can consume more energy and by dividing the tasks and through their mate’s cooperation they can have better results and can achieve without stress and anxiety. Consequently, proponents of cooperative surroundings emphasize effective results by them.

In my opinion, neither competition nor cooperation is sufficient alone; a balances approach is a useful tool in any working environment. Competitive surroundings can help to develop more creativity while through cooperation it could be easier to approach any working aspect.

In conclusion, while competition encourages hard work and innovation, cooperation fosters collaboration and wellbeing. A combination of both applied to relative context, is likely to produce most positive outcomes.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the prompt well. It discusses both views regarding competition and cooperation and provides a clear personal opinion in the concluding paragraphs. Ideas are well-developed and supported with relevant examples, such as mentioning medical research teams and university projects to illustrate cooperation, and student grade comparison for competition. Although there is a minor tendency to over-generalise in parts of the reasoning, the overall task requirements are fully satisfied, earning a solid band score for this criterion.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is logically organised with a clear progression throughout. It is divided into an introduction, two body paragraphs discussing each view, a personal opinion paragraph, and a conclusion. Cohesive devices are used reasonably well to connect ideas, such as 'On one hand', 'On the other hand', and 'Consequently'. However, referencing and transitional phrases occasionally feel somewhat mechanical or repetitive. Paragraphing is used sufficiently and appropriately, maintaining clarity from start to finish.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary suitable for the task, attempting less common items such as 'contemporary world', 'cooperative surroundings', and 'complications'. However, there are noticeable word-choice and collocation errors throughout the text, for instance, writing 'are two fundamentals' aspects' instead of 'fundamental aspects', 'be perform better', and 'balances approach' instead of 'balanced approach'. These errors do not impede communication, but they restrict the lexical score to a band 6.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay displays a mix of simple and complex sentence forms. The writer attempts various complex structures, but these frequently contain grammatical inaccuracies, such as 'competition and cooperation are two fundamentals’ aspects... that plays' (subject-verb agreement error), 'helps pushes people to be work harder', and 'to bring motivation and for foster more better skills'. Punctuation and article usage also exhibit persistent errors. While communication is rarely impeded, the frequency of grammatical slips prevents the score from reaching a higher band.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.