Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-23
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Few individuals believes that race with others at workplace, classes and in normal life is a positive sign because they want to be ahead than others. Whereas other argue that, help each other instead contesting. I believe that, aiding others could make society developed than competing.
In the modern era, everyone engaged in race to be first in all places. In the advanced artificial intelligence period people using mulitple techonology to complete projects, homeworks and using advanced equipments in regular life to be on top of the list of appreciation among others. Moreover , even in transportation, people do compete to evalute with others. For example, in China childrens in the schools using AI platforms to prepare automated robots in order to utilize in normal life to accomplish hard works. However, now in the world china is declare as number one in technology compare to other nations.
On the other hand, some helping hands making community more strengthen rather than struggling. when any of them in need, neighbours and family members should come forward for essential support and make the way. In addition to these, numerous employees work as a team, in teaching places teachers must guide the students to be beneficial for others. For instance, Nepal recently suffered from flood, in that many of them were searching their neighbours, relatives and others rather than loved ones. This presents the cooperation with among others.
In conclusion, I believe that understanding each other in circumstance than ignoring or making tournament would lead to negative impact on scoiety. Working together at workplace, in classess and daily routine could build strong nation.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The response addresses all parts of the prompt by discussing both the view that competition is positive and the perspective favouring cooperation, while also stating a clear personal position in the introduction and conclusion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited and occasionally unclear due to phrasing issues. For instance, the discussion on artificial intelligence and robots in Chinese schools is somewhat disconnected from the broader theme of daily life competition, and the supporting examples lack full elaboration. While the stance is maintained throughout, the supporting arguments would benefit from greater depth and more precise reasoning to reach a higher band level. Therefore, a Band 5.5 is awarded.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The essay is divided into four paragraphs, showing an attempt at a standard structure with an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. There is a basic overall progression, and cohesive devices such as 'Moreover', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion' are employed to signpost the structure. However, referencing and logical transitions are frequently faulty or confusing, such as the abrupt transition in the third paragraph when discussing the Nepal flood. Furthermore, paragraphing lacks full cohesion as sentences within paragraphs do not always flow smoothly from one idea to the next. These issues place the response firmly in Band 5.0.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The student uses a limited and occasionally repetitive range of vocabulary, with frequent errors in word choice, form, and collocation that occasionally impede communication. Examples of inaccurate lexical choices include 'Few individuals believes that race with others' instead of 'competition', 'teaching places' instead of 'educational institutions', and spelling or morphological slips like 'mulitple techonology' and 'scoiety'. While there is an attempt to use less common items such as 'artificial intelligence' and 'cooperation', the frequent inaccuracies in collocation and vocabulary restrict the score to Band 5.0.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but control over grammar and punctuation is weak. There are frequent, noticeable errors throughout the text, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('Few individuals believes'), missing auxiliary verbs ('everyone engaged in race'), and awkward clause structures ('When any of them in need'). Punctuation errors, such as spaces before commas ('Moreover ,'), are also present. These frequent errors cause some difficulty for the reader and prevent the grammar from reaching a Band 6.0, making a Band 5.0 the most accurate descriptor.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.