Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-27
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Nowadays a bunch of people believe that competing at work place, at educational institute, and normal life is better thing meanwhile their competitors say that we have to make sure to help eachother except doing bettle with one another.I have a concern with those persons to believe to help other. Im here to write an eassy with some suitable examples.
First of all, life become change so rapidly due to which many types of perceptions are diverted from recent behaviour to current opinion of people.Heavy compition can be seen in all the places.On the first side a bgroup of people like to do challange with some one, with the fath of to overcome other person.Different types of stratigies is made to achieve their goal.A greedy can be observed in this situation where a person make their secrets doing every kind of activity to abtain their progress.This group do all the thing with the percpective of gain high values, differentiate looking, more money, a showing image.For instance, on work places people mostly pulling other one by making some difficulties in many kinds of work, so that they can obtained a significant attention and getting all the reward.
On the other hand, a group of individuals believe that helping others is more suitable rather than competing.These human being always try to help others by their idea, ability,and knowledge. If some one stuck in a difficulty they help them to resolve issues. They feel satisfaction and get a lot of respect to the reaction of their action.Moreover, this thing dcevelop a good and strong relationship amoung them. For example if a bussinessman gives some advice to a person related to their field problemand these advices help to solve many issues, it may procude a good bounding between them. Its a way to enhance their good relations as well as their skills
In my point of view there is a big conflict in this discussion, many are feel calm to do compition with the thoughts of getting extra position while some argue that we always need to do help other. I also have a strong opinion helping other is more relieable as compared to put down someone. A better human being is those who always help other beacuse acourding to "NEWTON LAY OF MOTION" every action has their reaction, if you distribute more then you get more and vise versa.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The response addresses both parts of the prompt regarding competition and cooperation, and the student presents a clear personal opinion in favor of cooperation. Ideas are introduced, such as the negative aspects of fierce competition and the relationship-building benefits of cooperation, but they lack full development and deep elaboration. For instance, the example of a businessman giving advice is somewhat simplistic. Furthermore, generalizations are present, and the conclusion is slightly repetitive. However, the task is adequately engaged with across all required elements, meeting the criteria for a Band 5.5 to 6.0 range. Due to the under-developed supporting ideas and limited depth in places, it aligns best with Band 5.5.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The essay is divided into logical paragraphs, including an introduction, body paragraphs for each view, and a conclusion, fulfilling basic structural requirements. However, progression is frequently hindered by clumsy linking and repetitive transitional phrases such as "First of all," "On the first side," and "On the other hand." Cohesive devices are often inaccurate or mechanical (e.g., "a bunch of people," "this thing dcevelop a good and strong relationship amoung them"). Referencing is sometimes unclear, and punctuation errors disrupt the flow. Overall arrangement shows some organization, but the lack of smooth progression and accurate cohesive ties places this criterion at Band 5.0.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The vocabulary range is limited and frequently strained by noticeable word-choice and collocation errors. Examples include "compition" instead of competition, "bettle" instead of battle, "abtain" for obtain, and "bussinessman." The student attempts some less common vocabulary, such as "perceptions" and "stratigies," but spelling errors are persistent throughout the text (e.g., "amoung," "dcevelop," "relieable," "beacuse"). These errors cause some difficulty for the reader and restrict the lexical score to a Band 5.0, as the vocabulary is minimally adequate for conveying basic meaning but lacks precision and control.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but control over grammar is weak. There are frequent errors in subject-verb agreement, tense consistency, and article usage, such as "life become change so rapidly," "a group of people like to do challange," and "many are feel calm to do compition." Punctuation and capitalization are also erratic. While some simple sentences are successfully communicated, attempts at more complex constructions are consistently faulty, resulting in frequent errors that cause difficulty for the reader. This performance aligns with Band 5.0 descriptors.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.