Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Nowadays, our university is filled with skilled and performed people and with porgression of some phenomenons such as technology , hard working ,soft skills and braindraining would sginificantly appears the competeion between the member of society .

Some humans see those competition may be an importent stuff for daily work or for sudents and childrens .however, the other criticize the idea of being competitive and think that cooperation and collaboration the one thing will lead to achieve the work's aim or students goals .

Personnaly ,either way are interested and important that we need to involve it in our society .

For explanation, the idea of being competitive is an essential and significant if we put it in its apporpriate place example from my daily life im student and i'm always interested in mathematics subjects such as data analys , risk mesures and others includes mathematics calculations and i usully have good degrrees on it ,even though there ´s many competitors in my class they indirectly encourage me to stay always in process to develop my mental skills and practice more so then i can still as smart and as competent as they are . competetion in the final may lead people to progress and instill the desire to reach their goals even at work competitivity between colleage can stimulate skillful hardwoking staff and also the company achieves its aim of increasing benefits and entering international competitive markets thanks to the challenges between cowokers .

In the other side , cooperation between humans is either considered a significant pheonomenon for work culture and well being , it most likely stimulate solidarity ,collaboration and specially mission achievments ,such as working with group makes the process more easy which leads to set a clear vision forward and also sharing opinions between each other can results a prstegious and creative ideas that without this cooperation it will never been observed even between childrens in school creating a small group to help each other in particular subjects strengthen friendship and also they can explore and resolve some circomstances they were exposed in a such subjects.

To conclude , competitivity is usully an important thing for our world if we know how to use it optimistically to achieve positive goals that can develop our abilities , performences and specially positive influence to our environement and society .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both the views that competition is good and that cooperation should be preferred, and the student provides their own opinion. The position is clear throughout the essay. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited and relies heavily on broad personal generalisations rather than fully extended arguments. For instance, the discussion on competition in the author's own life as a student in mathematics is relevant, but the elaboration remains somewhat disjointed. Similarly, the points regarding cooperation are stated rather than deeply explored. While the task is adequately addressed, the overall depth of exploration aligns best with Band 6.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay is divided into paragraphs, but the logical progression and overall cohesion suffer from significant mechanical faults and run-on sentences. Many sentences are extremely long and strung together with basic connectors or commas, such as the opening sentence: 'Nowadays, our university is filled with skilled and performed people and with porgression of some phenomenons such as technology...'. Paragraphing is attempted, with distinct sections for the introduction, views, and conclusion, but transitional phrases are awkward or misused, such as 'For explanation' and 'In the other side'. Referencing is sometimes unclear, and the mechanical nature of the cohesion reduces the overall clarity of progression, placing this performance at a Band 5.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used demonstrates an attempt to incorporate less common items, such as 'phenomenon', 'competitivity', 'solidarity', and 'prestigious'. However, there are frequent errors in word choice, form, and spelling throughout the text, including 'porgression' instead of progression, 'braindraining' instead of brain drain, 'apporpriate' instead of appropriate, 'analys' instead of analysis, 'mesures' instead of measures, and 'circomstances' instead of circumstances. These lexical slips and inappropriate word formations, such as using 'competitivity' instead of competitiveness, occasionally impede communication and restrict the score to a Band 5.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response contains a very limited range of accurate sentence structures. The vast majority of sentences are long, convoluted run-on structures plagued by basic grammatical errors, punctuation flaws, and incorrect verb tenses. For example, clauses are improperly linked, as seen in 'cooperation between humans is either considered a significant pheonomenon for work culture and well being , it most likely stimulate solidarity...'. There are frequent errors in subject-verb agreement and article usage, such as 'im student' and 'results a prstegious and creative ideas'. Because complex sentences are attempted but frequently faulty, and errors are frequent enough to cause difficulty for the reader, the grammar aligns with Band 5.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.