Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays, people have different opinions about the competition and cooperation. A small number of individuals believe that competative environment at workplace, at institutes and in daily routine is benificial, whereas proponents argue that we ought make an effort to cooperate much instead of flighting for work against each other. Both perspective have valid arguments. It is essential to consider them before forming an opinion. Both viewpoints will be discussed in the upcoming pragraphs with valid reasons and appropriate examples.

To begin with, there are several positives aspacts behind the competition. The primary and most significant reason is that it improves productivities and creativities. At the workplace, employees can work hard for promotion camparing the other workers. As a result, compunies can experienced higher fianance in the short time periods. For example, students can gain extra knowledge and develop other skills from the competative atmosphere. Additionally, another factor is that it increases motivation. People can do higher efforts and achieve their goals.

On the other hand, other people think that cooperation is batter rather than competition. First and foremost, it provides better teamwork. Individuals share their knowledge and responsibility with other employees. Therrfore, they can enhance their understanding beacuse every people have different opinion about work. if people can copperate, they can easily slove all problem in very shortly. Moreover, cooparation can improve communication skill. People can reduse their work load with communicating their pears. Thus it decreases misunderstanding.

To sum up, although competitive pressure is advantagous because it enhances productivities and offers encouragement for new activities, i firmly believe that working togather can build strong relationship and reduse misunderstanding.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both the benefits of competition and cooperation, and the writer provides a clear personal opinion in the introduction and conclusion. However, the development of ideas is uneven. For instance, the arguments regarding productivity and creativity at the workplace are introduced with relevant notions, but the explanation remains somewhat superficial and repetitive, such as stating that employees 'can work hard for promotion camparing the other workers'. Similarly, the points about cooperation enhancing teamwork and reducing misunderstandings are presented but lack deeper extension with specific examples. While the position is clear throughout, some ideas are under-developed or rely on broad generalisations rather than fully articulated support, which prevents a higher evaluation.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay demonstrates a coherent overall arrangement with a clear, logical progression of ideas from the introduction to the body paragraphs and conclusion. Paragraphing is used sufficiently and appropriately, separating the two competing viewpoints into distinct sections. Cohesive devices are employed to signal transitions between ideas, using phrases like 'To begin with', 'On the other hand', and 'To sum up'. However, referencing and cohesion are occasionally mechanical or slightly faulty, as seen in repetitive sentence starters and awkward transitional links such as 'Therrfore, they can enhance their understanding beacuse every people have different opinion'. Furthermore, the integration of examples lacks seamlessness, pointing toward the characteristics of a response that has achieved this level but requires more flexible and natural referencing to advance.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, successfully communicating the writer's ideas about competition and workplace dynamics. The student attempts less common vocabulary items such as 'proponents', 'advantageous', and 'encouragement', demonstrating some range. However, there are noticeable spelling and word-choice errors throughout the text, including 'competative', 'benificial', 'flighting', 'aspacts', 'productivities', 'compunies', 'fianance', 'batter', 'Therrfore', 'beacuse', 'slove', 'cooparation', 'reduse', 'pears', and 'togather'. While these lexical inaccuracies and spelling slips do not severely impede communication, they recur frequently enough to restrict the score at this band level, reflecting a need for greater precision in word formation and spelling control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response exhibits a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, attempting structures such as conditional clauses and subordinate clauses like 'although competitive pressure is advantagous because it enhances productivities'. There are some errors in grammar and punctuation, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('every people have', 'compunies can experienced'), awkward prepositional usage, and minor capitalization oversights like 'i firmly believe'. Nevertheless, these errors are relatively infrequent and rarely impede overall communication, allowing the reader to follow the argument without significant difficulty. To reach the next tier, the writer would need to demonstrate a higher frequency of error-free complex sentences and finer control over grammatical patterns.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.