Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Many people believe that competition at work, at school moreover in daily life make a person enough strong to fight against any situation while other claim that everyone shuld coperate with the things rather than competition with each other i also believe that competition makes a man strong.

First of all, itr is worth considering that it have significant advantages such as it plays a crucial role in building skill like if there will no competition then the person selection will be depend on cast or any relationship if want gems to make our industry top noach we need the best employees who has proven himsef by giving his best and beated everyone that person depend the job rather then who coperate with things. for instance, on what bases doctor are qualified in terms of doctors would people every with doctor moreover if i m a honour of a firm i will need best employees to run my buisnees smoothly.

However, it is undeniable that coperate with thngs make treat everyone eqaully due to fact that there will be no competiton among the peoples. although, it is unforgetten that if we need growth of any firm or country we need the best output and that can only happen when we have the best competiton and that will by the help competition. because it creates the section of best, medium and worst choice for the appropriate work.

In conclusion, competiton should be at work, school and daily life because it is benificial for both both for the firm because the will get the best employee and for himself because it will assist to enhance the skiils.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by discussing both views on competition and cooperation, and the writer clearly states their own opinion that competition makes a person strong. However, the development of ideas remains limited and under-developed. For instance, the arguments regarding industry standards and hiring practices are presented in a very generalized, repetitive manner without sufficient extension. While the writer attempts to support their position with examples, such as mentioning doctors or business management, these points lack clarity and fail to be fully articulated. To reach a higher standard, the writer needs to present fully developed ideas with relevant, well-supported explanations and clear examples that directly reinforce the main arguments.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

There is some basic organization present, with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, showing an attempt at a logical layout. However, the response lacks a clear overall progression. Cohesive devices are frequently inadequate, inaccurate, or overused, and referencing is often unclear, which disrupts the flow of ideas. For example, transitional phrases and conjunctions are used awkwardly, such as linking clauses with repetitive or confusing structures like 'moreover' and 'because' without adequate punctuation or logical transitions. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal cohesion within paragraphs feels disjointed. To improve, the writer must ensure that sentences flow logically from one to the next using a wider and more accurate range of cohesive devices, alongside clear referencing to guide the reader seamlessly through the argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The vocabulary used is limited and repetitive, reflecting a basic range that is only minimally adequate for the task. There are noticeable errors in word choice, collocation, and word form that cause some difficulty for the reader throughout the text. Instances such as spelling mistakes ('coperate', 'trngs', 'eqaully', 'competiton', 'benificial'), incorrect word forms ('honour' instead of owner, 'buisnees'), and awkward collocations ('top noach', 'beated everyone') impede smooth communication. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, but inaccurate usage restricts precision. To achieve a higher band, the writer must expand their lexical repertoire, pay closer attention to standard spelling and word forms, and use vocabulary with greater accuracy and appropriateness for academic contexts.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The text displays a very limited range of structures, relying mostly on simple sentences or faulty attempts at complex sentences. There are frequent errors in grammar and punctuation that often cause difficulty for the reader and can obscure the intended meaning. Examples of grammatical issues include subject-verb agreement errors ('make a person', 'everyone shuld coperate', 'person depend'), missing articles ('on what bases doctor are qualified'), incorrect preposition use ('in terms of doctors'), and run-on sentences lacking proper terminal punctuation. To move up to the next level, the writer needs to demonstrate a greater variety of complex sentence forms, improve control over basic grammatical patterns such as tense consistency and agreement, and apply correct punctuation to make the writing much clearer and more accurate.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.