Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

There are two kind of opinions one promotes the sense of competition whereas the other flourishes the responsibility and cooperaton among community.

To begain with,competition creates a sense of completion.It helps people to achieve a task as soon as possible.For instance,at work employs compete each other to get rewards or promotions.This kind of environment helps employees to be consistent.Same is the case with school,where students struggle for good grades and as a result work under severe competition.Moreover,it creates a sense of punctuality among people.They become punctual,as they want to be prominent at workplace or school.

Admittebly,the other point also hold weightage.People should cooperate with each other.Instead of leg pulling they should work in a friendly environment.Through cooperation employees works in a close circle.Moreover,team work helps in building strong reputation of comapny as well a staff.As it said,'sharing is caring',this type of approach helps workers and students to promote positivism in daily life.Cooperation promotes responsibilty and as result instead of competition they perform their task as their duty.This kind of behaviour helps company to grow better.It also pose positive effect on other matter related to daily life.

To sum up,although both point holds merits but sharing is caring kind of approach shoud be useful rater than competing against each other.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by discussing both views on competition and cooperation and provides a personal opinion in the conclusion, fitting the partial requirement level. However, some ideas are limited and under-developed, particularly the arguments for competition, which rely on repetitive points about rewards and punctuality without sufficient extension. Furthermore, the length requirement is not met, as the response contains only 209 words, falling short of the required 250-word minimum. To reach a higher level, the writer needs to fully develop all parts of the task with more detailed explanations and examples while meeting the required word count.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay displays some organization with clear paragraphing and basic attempts at introduction and conclusion. However, there is no clear overall progression of ideas, and cohesive devices are frequently inadequate or inaccurate, such as 'To begain with,' and 'Admittebly,' along with mechanical transitions between sentences. Referencing is sometimes unclear, and the overall logical flow is disrupted by abrupt shifts between points. To improve in this area, the writer should use a wider variety of cohesive devices more accurately and ensure a smoother, more logical progression of ideas from one paragraph to the next.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited and minimally adequate for the task, with noticeable errors that occasionally cause difficulty for the reader. There are spelling and word choice mistakes throughout the text, such as 'cooperaton' instead of 'cooperation', 'employes' instead of 'employees', 'comapny' instead of 'company', and colloquial expressions like 'leg pulling' and 'sharing is caring'. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, but inaccurate word forms and collocations prevent clearer communication. To progress, the student should expand their range of vocabulary and practice the correct spelling and contextual usage of academic terms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writing demonstrates a limited range of structures, relying mostly on simple sentences, while attempts at more complex sentence forms are often faulty. There are frequent errors in grammar and punctuation throughout the text, including missing articles ('at school', 'in close circle'), incorrect verb forms ('employees works'), and punctuation spacing issues following periods. These frequent errors can cause some difficulty for the reader. To achieve a higher score, the writer must incorporate a wider variety of complex sentence structures with greater accuracy and improve control over basic grammatical agreements and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.