Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Competition at workplaces, educational institutions and in everyday life is attributed as a good thing, however some people contend that on should focus more on cooperation instead of competition while dealing with others. Though competition increases our potential, I largely agree that cooperation is more beneficial for personal and psycological well-being.

Competition in individuals increases their potential. When competing with others, people not only learn different skills but also try to improve themselves in saveral capacities. Healthy competition makes people uspcale them to surpass the skill level of others. As a result, people grow enormously that in returns helps the society. Competition, moreover, also have a positive impact in different fields, such as education where kids excel in academics while competing with their fellows. Along with that, competition in businesses and manufactoring companies uplifts the quality of products. This can be seen in Japan, for example, which is famous for the production of quality cars. As numerous industries sell them and in order to increase their sales, they have to invest more in the quality of cars. Eventually it will bring more benefits to consumers.

In contrast, cooperative environement brings positive results in people's physical and psychological health. When people in the surroundings are cooperative, this brings positive and healthy relations among them. As a result, productivity will be increased and workers would be happy to be more invested in their jobs. Moreover, cooperative environment brings people closer to each other that improves their team work and collective problem solving skills. All this makes them more productive. For instance, companies like Google and Microsoft have more creative and productive employees because their workplace environment is more cooperative.

In conclusion, people widely believe that one should embrace competition in different walks of life to surpass others. Although it increases their skills, I am more inclined to cooperation as it brings positivity and improves productivity.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You address both sides of the question and state a clear position: although competition can develop ability, you favour cooperation for well-being and productivity. The two body paragraphs explain relevant benefits, and the examples of competition among car manufacturers and cooperative workplaces help support your discussion. This fits a response that covers all parts and extends its main ideas. Some support, however, is broad rather than fully explained: the claim that competition makes people “grow enormously” does not specify how this happens, and the Google and Microsoft example asserts that cooperation makes employees more creative without showing why. Develop these links with a concrete mechanism or outcome, and make the comparison between the two approaches more explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction presents your view, separate paragraphs discuss competition and cooperation, and the conclusion restates your preference. The progression within each paragraph is generally logical, and signposts such as “In contrast,” “Moreover,” and “For instance” help readers follow the argument. This is a coherent, well-organised response. At times, however, linking becomes repetitive or mechanical: several sentences begin with “As a result,” “Moreover,” or “Along with that,” and the competition paragraph moves from individual development to education and then business without a particularly smooth transition. Use a wider range of linking methods, including clearer topic sentences and pronoun reference, to connect related points more naturally.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including terms such as “potential,” “psychological well-being,” “collective problem solving,” and “productivity.” These choices allow you to discuss both individual and workplace effects, and the meaning is generally clear. However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “is attributed as a good thing,” “upscale them to surpass,” and “in returns helps the society.” There are also spelling errors, including “psycological,” “saveral,” “manufactoring,” and “environement.” These slips limit precision even when the intended meaning can be inferred. Aim for more natural combinations and proofread carefully; for example, use “is regarded as beneficial” and “in turn benefits society.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including subordinate clauses beginning “When” and “Although,” and most sentences communicate their main point. Some grammatical errors remain, particularly with agreement, articles, and sentence construction. For example, “competition … also have a positive impact” should use a singular verb, while “a cooperative environment” needs an article in “cooperative environment brings people closer.” The opening sentence also joins two independent clauses with a comma before “however”; use a full stop or semicolon, or punctuate “however” appropriately. In “people grow enormously that in returns helps,” the clause connection is faulty. Review agreement and clause boundaries, while continuing to practise varied complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.