Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

A large amount of people believe that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a beneficial thing. While others widely believe that we should try to cooperate additional, rather than contesting against each other. From my perspective the second concept is better than first.

The first point to consider is that the beneficial thing in daily life is contesting. Competition make people more productive and member struggles more in rivalry. While at school, learners work more and learn more to win the contest. It make them more well-informed and learn more prowess. For instance, in Allied schools of Punjab, they organize activities to make their students more learners and to gain skills in their field to rival with each other. This is the best way to face obstacles in your daily life and at your work.

Another argument in against of this concept is that public assume that we should try to collaborate more, whereas rivalry opposed each other. Collaboration in your daily life works or things is the best method or way to acheive your goals and tackle your complications. A numerous people work together in their works. They gain skills to work together in field or work which they have to done in a limited time. If learners in school study together they will learn the task easily and in less time. For instance, In Chenab college jhang, they give tasks to their students to do this work and give us in a experiment or in a assighment form. Therefore students do this together and they learn more about theri task just because of coordinate work.

I strongly agree with the second concept of people to work combine. Due to this youmlearn many motor prowesses and make attachement in each other. While in first view you should work alone.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both competition and cooperation and state a clear preference for cooperation in the opening and conclusion. The competition paragraph gives relevant reasons—such as encouraging students to work harder—and includes a school example. The cooperation paragraph also explains how working together can help people complete tasks. However, the discussion is only partly developed: several claims are broad or unclear, and the examples are described without showing precisely how they demonstrate the benefits. The final contrast that people should “work alone” also conflicts with your stated preference for cooperation. To strengthen the response, explain each view more fully and make sure the conclusion consistently reflects your position. The response meets the task’s length requirement; 12 words copied from the prompt were excluded from the count.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has an identifiable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a concluding opinion. This helps the reader follow the broad direction of the discussion. However, progression within paragraphs is uneven, and some links are unclear. For example, “Another argument in against of this concept” does not clearly signal the shift to cooperation, while “While at school” begins a fragment rather than connecting smoothly to the preceding point. Repeated transitions such as “For instance” and “Therefore” sometimes introduce examples without clearly explaining their relationship to the claim. Use topic sentences that identify each paragraph’s main point, then connect each example explicitly to that point; also ensure the conclusion follows logically from the body.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “productive,” “rivalry,” “collaborate,” “complications,” and “coordinate work.” However, the range is limited by repetition of “work,” “learn,” and “more,” and several word choices or collocations make meaning difficult to follow. For example, “cooperate additional,” “member struggles more in rivalry,” and “motor prowesses” are not natural expressions in this context. Spelling errors such as “acheive,” “assighment,” and “theri” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, natural phrases rather than substituting uncommon words where they do not fit. Building a small set of topic-specific collocations and checking spelling would make your ideas clearer and more effective.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including contrast clauses beginning with “While” and conditional structures such as “If learners in school study together…”. However, control is inconsistent, and errors frequently affect clarity. Examples include the subject–verb agreement error “Competition make,” the incomplete opening “While others widely believe…,” and the malformed construction “A numerous people work together.” Articles and sentence boundaries also need attention, as in “in a experiment” and the comma splice in “Therefore students do this together and they learn more.” Practise forming complete sentences, checking subject–verb agreement, and using articles and punctuation consistently. These corrections would make your argument easier to understand.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.