Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

According to some factions, competition in professional life, at eductaional institutions and in routein matters of life is a positive thing. While many are of the view that we should be more understanding and helping, instead of giving eath other tough times. In my opinion, this notion could be taken in both, healthy and opposing,contexts.

Competetion can be constructive and can keeps one motivated in order to achieve their aims. For instance, in a class of 20 students, its not possible for every single student to stand first or get distinction in exams. Its obvious that it would only be one of them who'd be marked as an exceptional student. To attain this goal, every student get through a cut-throat competition and face challanges that comes in between the path of win. Another example of healthy competition can be well understood by the struggle of a person, who is thriving for so long to get his desired job. For that, he applies against the particular post and get in the queue along with other potential candidates. This form of competition is considered as merit based as the most desrving among all the applicants, will make it to the finals. Therefore, we can say that competition is a good thing.

Opposing to the above view, sometimes it becomes our moral duty to go on back foot and cooperate, rather than compete. For example; lets talk about a professional setting. Your boss has assigned you a task to train a new hire. So, its your moral responsibility to do this job with full honesty and fairness, instead of taking the new group member as a potential threat and get into the leg pulling race.

Therefore, competition can be both constuctive and destructive in nature and it largely deppends up opn the settings or situation in which a person has to compete.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You discuss both competition and cooperation and give a position: competition can be constructive or destructive depending on the situation. The classroom and job-application examples make the benefits of competition relevant, while the workplace training example illustrates cooperation. However, the two sides are not developed equally: the competition argument has two examples and a conclusion, whereas cooperation is supported by only one brief scenario. Your opening says the issue can be viewed in both ways, but your own judgement would be clearer if you explained when cooperation is preferable and why. Develop the consequences of each approach, rather than relying mainly on examples, to make the discussion more complete and persuasive.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph for each view, and a concluding statement. Sequencing within the competition paragraph is easy to follow, and phrases such as “For instance” and “Another example” signal the examples. However, some links feel mechanical or imprecise. “Opposing to the above view” is an awkward transition, and “Therefore” appears at the end of both the first body paragraph and the essay, creating repetition. The cooperation paragraph is also much shorter, so the discussion feels unbalanced. Use transitions that show the exact relationship between ideas, and connect the example to a fuller explanation of why cooperation matters.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “constructive,” “merit based,” “potential candidates,” and “moral responsibility.” These choices help communicate the main ideas, but inaccurate spelling and word choice are noticeable and sometimes make the phrasing unnatural: “eductaional,” “routein,” “desrving,” and “leg pulling race” are examples. Some expressions also do not fit the intended meaning, such as “giving each other tough times” and “go on back foot.” This keeps the vocabulary from being consistently precise and natural. Check spelling carefully and learn common collocations for discussing competition and cooperation; prefer clear, accurate phrasing over idioms you are unsure how to use.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use both simple and more complex forms, including a conditional example (“if…”) and a relative clause (“who is thriving…”), so there is some structural variety. The main meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “competition…can keeps” has incorrect verb form, “every student get” needs subject–verb agreement, and “challenges that comes” also has an agreement error. There are issues with articles and sentence boundaries in “in both, healthy and opposing, contexts,” while several sentences use comma splices or awkward punctuation. Review agreement and verb forms, and proofread punctuation. More consistently accurate complex sentences would strengthen control without sacrificing the range you already attempt.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.