Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is beneficial. However, others argue that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other. I agree that competition at school, at work and in daily life is a good thing.

Nowadays, some people believe that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. There are several reasons that show competition is important in everywhere. To begin with, competition helps to identify the people with their logical thinking ability and working skills for finding suitable job role. It will results to improve productivity at school or in an office. Additionally, competition improves the person's knowledge and memory learning ablility which is useful for their profession or in a daily life For instance, competition helps people to gain some knowledge to competite with others.

On the other hand, others argue that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other. There are several aspects which shows that we should be cooperative to each others. Firstly, cooperating with others will helpes to built strong relationship within collegues and it will boost the productivity of an organization. Lastly, cooperating with others will help to work with different mindset and logical thinking people which will help to gain some information from their ablility which will help them to learn something new.

I agree that competition is important in everywhere such as in school, in work or in daily life because it test the knowledge and thinking ablility of an individual which help to identify the suitable person for any purpose.

In conclusion, competiton and cooperate both is important at work place, at education and in daily life. Nevertheless competition is more important than cooperate.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You discuss both competition and cooperation and state your preference for competition in the introduction and conclusion. However, the response only partially develops the task: the points about competition identifying suitable workers and improving knowledge are asserted rather than explained with a clear example, while the cooperation paragraph gives benefits but does not weigh them against your preferred view. The conclusion also says both are important before declaring competition more important, without resolving this contrast. The response contains 232 words, so it is 18 words below the required minimum; 62 words copied from the task prompt were not counted. To strengthen the response, explain each main reason and add a relevant example, then make your comparison and position consistent.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “To begin with,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the broad direction. However, progression within paragraphs is limited, and several ideas repeat rather than build: the opening and first body paragraph both restate that competition is a good thing, and the final paragraph repeats the same preference. Some links are mechanical, while references such as “which will help” recur without making the relationship between ideas precise. Develop a clearer sequence in each body paragraph—claim, explanation, example—and use more varied, accurate links between those steps.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “competition,” “cooperate,” “productivity,” “logical thinking,” and “relationship.” This is enough to communicate the main ideas, but the range is limited and key words are repeated frequently, especially “competition,” “help,” and “important.” Several word choices or forms are inaccurate, such as “in everywhere,” “competite,” “collegues,” and “ablility,” and phrases like “memory learning ability” are unclear. These errors sometimes make the intended meaning less easy to follow. Build a wider set of precise terms for discussing collaboration and performance, and check spelling and natural word combinations. For example, use “in many settings” rather than “in everywhere,” and “compete” rather than “competite.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentences, and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, the range is limited, and attempts at more complex structures often contain errors. Examples include “It will results” (incorrect verb form), “cooperating with others will helpes” (incorrect verb form), and “competition … it test” (subject–verb agreement). There are also problems with articles, plurals, and sentence boundaries, as in “in a daily life For instance,” where a full stop is needed. These recurring errors can make some sentences difficult to read. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and verb patterns after modal verbs, and punctuate complete sentences carefully before adding more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.