Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-16

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

It is consinder by many individual that, challeging other during school as well as work place is essantial thing,where as many people think it is wrong choice to compete with other as it should be overcome by stay connected with other . I firmly beliave that coporating in good way can lead person towards enhancement.In forethcoming paragraph i will discuss both with mt view.

The foremost reason according to my aspect is more enemies are fromed. To accentuate it , nowadays people feel bad immidately as compare to traditional life .Moreover, people with there archuvmrnt feel good, yet if some one loss ones the relation between can broken and that can lead several issues for further life span in perticular area. For instance, Oxfoard University proven that people more competing nature face multiple problem in life attraction. Hence, compition may conclude various problem for people .

On the other hand , person with double face lead to more archievment along with relations . To elaborate it, in this modern era people with double standards can leads to higher level , as person with whom one can face compition do freindship which strengthen the relation as well as over power the archivement with that bond. By citing an example, survay proves that true freinds jealouse less on scoring less by other then one who is not freind.Thus, it can make freindship along with precuring jealouse factore.

On the way to conclusion, although people get good archivement but competing nature can lead to life threatning situations .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You present a view in favour of cooperation and include paragraphs intended to discuss both competition and cooperation, so the response is relevant to the question. However, the discussion only partially addresses the task: the first body paragraph focuses on enemies and damaged relationships, while the second is difficult to interpret and seems to suggest that competition can produce achievement and friendship. The distinction between cooperation and competition is therefore unclear, and your position is not consistently explained. The examples attributed to Oxford University and a survey are asserted rather than explained, so they do not adequately support the claims. To strengthen the response, explain the benefits of competition as well as cooperation, then state clearly how these considerations lead to your opinion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. Linking expressions such as “On the other hand” and “For instance” show an attempt to guide the reader through the argument. However, progression is not consistently clear: the second body paragraph begins “person with double face,” which does not clearly connect to the stated view about cooperation, and the conclusion introduces “life threatening situations” without developing this idea earlier. Some transitions are mechanical, and references such as “it” and “that bond” have unclear meanings. Organise each body paragraph around one clearly stated view, and use topic sentences and linking phrases that make the relationship between each claim and example explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “competing nature,” “achievement,” “relations” and “jealousy,” and you try to express abstract ideas about social effects. However, spelling errors and inaccurate word choices are frequent enough to make parts of the argument difficult to understand. Examples include “consinder,” “challeging,” “archuvmrnt” and “precuring”; phrases such as “people with double face” and “life attraction” are also unclear or unnatural. This limits the precision and flexibility of the vocabulary. Build a reliable set of topic words and check spelling, word forms and collocations. Prefer clear expressions such as “damage relationships” or “work together” over phrases whose meaning is uncertain.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “whereas,” “if” and “as.” However, complex sentences are often faulty, and frequent errors in sentence construction, agreement, articles and punctuation can make the meaning difficult to follow. For example, “I firmly beliave that coporating in good way can lead person towards enhancement” lacks clear grammatical framing, while “if some one loss ones the relation between can broken” has several problems with verb forms and clause structure. Commas and spacing are also inconsistent, particularly around transitions. Practise building accurate short sentences first, then combine them using one clear subordinate clause at a time; check subject–verb agreement and verb forms during revision.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.