Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Brainstroming

- encouragement in participants

- boost confident

-better bonding

realise mistake

It is debated whether it better to competition at diffrent fields or involving in group cooperation. This essay will discuss the both views before giving my perspective.

To begin with, there are numerous individuals favours that competiton is better than cooperate due to several reasons. One of the prominent reasons is boost confident. To explain it, participanting in competition on different sectors such as sports, education and daily life create confident and more exprience to involving competition in future. Similarly, encouragement in participants is another reason supporting this view. For instant, if someone who won the game which encourage to participants more games in future.

On the other hand, many people avocated that cooperating is good way insted of competing against each other because of various aspects. One of the major aspect is better bonding To clarify to, when indivduals involving in groups they can interact and share information among them which create good relation between the members of team. Likewise, learn more knowledge is the second factor. To elaborating it, while cooperating in team there are many individuals who have knowledge about diffrent sector form where other members can learn more information about anything.

To wrap it, many people supporting competition is better to boost confident and encourage to involving in participants while other half public favours the involving in groups creats bood and learn knowledge. In my concern, cooperating helps to learn about many things which related to work or personal life.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both sides of the discussion and give a personal view, so the response is relevant to the task. The competition paragraph identifies confidence and encouragement, while the cooperation paragraph explains bonding and learning from teammates. However, these points are mostly asserted rather than fully developed: the example about a winner encouraging participants to play more games is unclear, and the conclusion says cooperation helps in work or personal life without explaining why this outweighs the benefits of competition. Your position is present, but it appears mainly at the end. Develop each main idea with a clearer explanation or specific example, and state your view more directly in the introduction as well as the conclusion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. This helps the reader follow the broad discussion. You also use signposting such as “To begin with,” “On the other hand,” and “To wrap it.” However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow because ideas are repeated or linked mechanically. For example, “Similarly” introduces another reason, but the example that follows is not clearly connected to the claim. Some references are also unclear, as in “which encourage to participants.” Improve the logical links between claim, explanation, and example, and use fewer formulaic transitions. A more focused conclusion should summarise the comparison and reinforce your opinion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “competition,” “cooperating,” “participants,” “share information,” and “members of team.” This gives you enough language to communicate the main ideas, but the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, word-form, and spelling errors make the writing less natural. Examples include “boost confident,” “better bonding,” “learn more knowledge,” and “avocated.” Some phrases are repeated, particularly “competition” and “cooperating,” rather than being expressed more precisely. Work on common academic collocations and check spelling and word forms carefully. More accurate choices such as “build confidence,” “strengthen relationships,” and “gain knowledge” would make your points clearer and more fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including clauses beginning with “when,” “while,” and “which.” However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to interpret. For example, “It is debated whether it better to competition” lacks a complete grammatical structure, while “if someone who won the game which encourage” has problems with clause construction and verb agreement. Other examples include “when individuals involving in groups” and “many people supporting competition.” Practise forming complete clauses with a clear subject and correctly conjugated verb, and check articles, plurals, and agreement. Aim first for accurate, controlled sentences before adding more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.