Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The most controversial issue nowadays is whether the number of working days should be decreased. In modren world different challanges are rising every day and the most common are now health issues as well as the surged prices of fuel. I strongly agree that there should be extended weekend because a proper balance required for the working class to contend emerging issues.

The long weekend will have positive impact on the current labor market. They will be able to spend quality time with family and friends. This will ultimately lower their stress and anxiety which will consequently improve productivity. The good performance will directly benefit the company or office they are performing duties. I want to give you another reason for prolong weekend that why I supported this idea becuse of the current wars between USA and Iran, Russia and Ukrine. As we know that these had created fluctuations in petroleum market. The prices of fuel reached to its peak, moreover this hike create a panic among the common folks so going for duty to each day will cost them more.

Although some people critisize that it should be not change because it will create a gap in work. It will disturb the market norms and effect the productions. According to them the gap will not be filled sooner. The overall social and economic cycle will face an immence shift and specifically for those whose are working in hospitals and other important sectors.

In conclusion, I firmly belive that long weekend is the requirement of current scenario because it will provide a hope to deprieved community who are observing the pressing problems of today's world.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction (“I strongly agree”) and conclusion, and you give relevant reasons: more time with family may reduce stress and improve productivity, while higher fuel costs make daily commuting more expensive. You also acknowledge the opposing view about disruption to workplaces, including hospitals, so the response addresses both the opinion and a counterargument. However, some points are less fully developed than others. The link between international conflicts, fuel prices and the need for a longer weekend is asserted rather than explained with a specific example, and the concern about essential services is introduced without showing how shorter working weeks could be managed. Develop these points with clearer reasoning and practical detail.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present supporting and opposing points, and a conclusion restates your position. Ideas generally follow a sensible order, and connectors such as “This will ultimately” and “Although” help show relationships. At times, however, cohesion is mechanical or unclear. The sentence beginning “I want to give you another reason” shifts into direct address, and “these” in the reference to wars does not clearly identify what it refers to. The second body paragraph also moves quickly from workplace gaps to market norms and then essential sectors. Use clearer referencing and connect each consequence explicitly to the central question.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “productivity,” “stress and anxiety,” “fluctuations,” and “economic cycle.” These choices help communicate ideas about work, commuting and society, and some less common terms are attempted. However, several spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision, such as “modren,” “challanges,” “prolong weekend,” and “deprieved community.” Some combinations are also unnatural, including “the prices of fuel reached to its peak” and “disturb the market norms.” Aim for accurate collocations and check spelling carefully; precise, natural phrasing will make your argument more convincing without requiring more complicated vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional relationship in “This will ultimately lower their stress … which will consequently improve productivity” and a concession introduced by “Although.” The main ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors occur across the response. Examples include missing articles or auxiliaries in “a proper balance required” and “there should be extended weekend,” and incorrect sentence structure in “Although some people critisize that it should be not change.” There are also agreement and verb-form problems, as in “this hike create” and “those whose are working.” Review articles, subject–verb agreement and clause construction, then proofread punctuation and sentence boundaries to improve control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.