Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

there are two distinct thoughts regarding this matter, at first shorter working week with longer weekend gives abudent time for the employees to get themselves more relaxed refreshed which will increase their overall productivity in reduce work hours, secondly the superior authority in the corporate sector feels that they will lose the productivity and eventually have to hire more people at cost, and i will agree and disagree to some extent.

One one hand there is a though of having reduce working hours with more stretched weekends is because the employee works more efficently in that way when they have a sense of relief that they will get enough time to relax and enjoy the family time and some big companies around the world are already working on this model. For instance, if we look at Microsoft and Google their corporate working culture is quite relaxed where the employees work on 3 to 4 days in a total week and still the companies are getting more productivity.

on the other hand there is another thought of corporate culture where they feel that they will lose the overall productivity by providing extended weekend and reduce working hours their employees get inefficient and on top of that they have to hire more people which will lead to more cost and the company have to suffer financial loss along with the decline in their production ratio moreover its true to some extent for the companies who are engaged in the production of commodities for instance for a company like Coca cola its might not be much suitable to provide reduce working shifts because that would surely lead to decline in the production output of the company.

So yeah on these thoughts i would agree to some extent for those corporate employees who are engaged in office work and their minds get stressed out by continious work but on the other hand i would disagree in this matter because in production plants this model can't be practically appplicable as they will suffer in their overall productivity but their are other solutions of multiple shifts to ease the pressure from the working peoples in a production unit

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both sides of the proposal and give a qualified position: shorter weeks may suit office-based work, while production settings may need different arrangements. The examples of technology companies and Coca-Cola help make this distinction relevant. This meets the task well, and your position is present in the conclusion. However, the opening says you “agree and disagree to some extent” without immediately clarifying the conditions, and the company examples are asserted rather than explained or evidenced. The production argument is more developed than the benefits to workers, which are mainly described as relaxation and family time. State your position clearly in the introduction and extend each main reason with a specific explanation of how shorter hours affect output or staffing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two contrasting body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The contrast between “One one hand” and “on the other hand” makes the main progression easy to follow, and the final paragraph returns to your qualified view. This gives the essay a coherent arrangement. However, some sentences contain several ideas joined together, particularly the paragraph about production companies, so the relationship between claims is not always clear. Connectors such as “moreover” and “on top of that” sometimes add to long, crowded sentences rather than clarifying the logic. Use clearer sentence boundaries, and make each paragraph’s central point explicit before adding its explanation and example. This would make cohesion less mechanical and referencing easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “overall productivity,” “financial loss,” “production output,” and “corporate working culture.” These phrases show an attempt to discuss workplace policy with some specificity. However, inaccurate spelling and word choice are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause: “abudent,” “efficently,” “continious,” and “appplicable” are examples. Some combinations are also unnatural, such as “stretched weekends,” “production ratio,” and “working peoples.” The range is sufficient to communicate your main ideas, but repeated use of general terms such as “thought” and “work” limits precision. Check spelling carefully and learn common collocations for employment, productivity, and manufacturing; this will make your argument sound more natural and exact.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “because” and “where,” and the reader can generally understand your position. However, complex sentences are often not controlled successfully. For example, the sentence beginning “on the other hand there is another thought” runs through several claims without clear sentence boundaries, and the opening uses a comma splice to join contrasting points. There are also errors in agreement and sentence construction, such as “the company have to suffer” and “their employees get inefficient.” Capitalisation and punctuation are inconsistent, including lowercase “i” and missing full stops. Break long sentences into shorter units, check subject–verb agreement, and use punctuation to show how each clause relates to the next.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.