Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The days of the week through which workers are asked to work should be shorter and they should be given a longer weekend to rest in order to get back to work routine again. Working continuously causes varies health problems in the long run.

Working throughout the week is draining both emotionally and physically. For example, In a corporate job, where people usually work between 9am and 5pm, they spend maximum amount of their day sitting watching a computer screen. It causes a lot of eye strain, bad posture can influence many health problems and they have to undergo this for an entire week which drains them physically. Sometimes weekends has to be sacrificed in some cases for extra work where they do not get a chance to spend time with their family and friends which exhausts them emotionally.

Hence, it is only fair when they bring out a rule upon where only 3 days of the entire week people are allowed to work. The remaining 4 days should be allocated for the people to rest. Because working continuously throughout a longer week causes exhaustion. Moreover, people have a family of their own, a longer weekend gives a chance to spend quality time with them.

Overall, with regards to the health concerns both emotionally and physically, a longer weekend will help the workers to heal from the physical and emotional distress they undergo throughout the week. It also accelerates them to get back to work and perform tasks more efficiently again.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you support a shorter working week and a longer weekend, and you give relevant reasons involving physical and emotional exhaustion, family time, and recovery. The examples of screen-based work and weekend overtime help connect the argument to workers’ lives. This meets the task well overall, but some points are asserted rather than fully explained. For instance, the proposal that people should work only three days is quite specific, yet you do not explain why this schedule is practical or how it would affect employers and productivity. The health effects are also described generally. To strengthen the response, develop one or two examples with clearer explanation and address a possible concern about reducing working days.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph about the effects of work, a proposal, and a concluding summary. The progression from exhaustion to the benefits of more rest is easy to follow, and linking expressions such as “For example,” “Moreover,” and “Overall” help signal relationships between ideas. However, some connections feel mechanical or unclear. “Hence” introduces the three-day proposal without showing why that exact number follows from the preceding points, while “Because working continuously…” is a sentence fragment rather than a complete explanation. The conclusion also repeats several ideas from the body. For stronger progression, make the relationship between each claim and its support explicit, and use referencing and transitions more naturally.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary to discuss work and wellbeing, including “emotionally and physically,” “eye strain,” “quality time,” and “physical and emotional distress.” These choices make the main ideas clear, and some topic-specific language is appropriate. There are also several imprecise or unnatural expressions, such as “work routine again,” “maximum amount of their day,” and “bring out a rule upon where.” “Accelerates them to get back to work” does not express the intended idea naturally, and “bad posture can influence many health problems” uses an unsuitable collocation. Aim for more precise, natural combinations and avoid repeating “longer weekend” and “exhaustion” without variation. This would make the vocabulary more flexible and accurate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “where people usually work between 9am and 5pm” and a conditional idea in “where they do not get a chance to spend time with their family and friends.” The overall meaning remains understandable, but some errors in agreement, verb forms, sentence boundaries, and punctuation reduce accuracy. For example, “Working continuously causes varies health problems” has an incorrect verb form, and “Sometimes weekends has to be sacrificed” has a subject–verb agreement error. “Because working continuously throughout a longer week causes exhaustion” is a fragment, while “bad posture can influence many health problems” is not grammatically well formed. Review agreement and ensure each sentence has a complete main clause.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.