Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In this era of technology and civilization, a large number of individuals believe that the working hours should be reduced and holidays should be increased. Work is a part of our daily life but can be stessful sometimes. From my perspective, I firmly agree with this view, and my stance will be elaborated in the following paragraphs along with an appropriate conclusion.

To support my agreement with the given statement, I strongly believe that, if the work is interesting or the salary is justifying the work than only a person may want to do more passionately. For example, if you love to ride a car than you can be a professional car driver. This work will not only fascinate you but also give you a source of income. In contrast, it gets quite difficult to maintain our physical and mental stress in control. This facts is also well aligned with all the works we do. For reducing our stress we should get a shorter hours of work and a longer weekend.

Discussing another supporting argument in favor of this statement, a good amount of break for the employees can lead to a better relationship with the manager. As a result, the workers tend to perform more for the manager or the company. Additionally, it is one of the main duties for the authorities that to take care of the workers and always support them in their logical demands. Consequently, it will create a bridge of trust and the company can grow faster.

In conclusion, for the betterment of individuals health the working hours should be shorter as well as the weekend time should be longer. It will better if it is done by the government involvement.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you agree that working hours should be reduced and weekends extended, and the conclusion restates this view. You also offer relevant points about stress and workplace relationships. However, the reasons are only partly developed, so the response does not fully explain how a shorter week would improve health or why longer breaks would strengthen relationships with managers. The car-driver example mainly illustrates enjoying a job, rather than directly supporting the case for a shorter working week. The suggestion that government should be involved is introduced only at the end and is not explained. Develop each main reason with a clear cause-and-effect explanation and a more directly relevant example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting supporting points, and a conclusion. Paragraphs generally have identifiable central topics, and signposting such as “To support my agreement” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the argument. This coherent arrangement meets the lower-band expectations well. To make progression more consistently smooth, reduce formulaic transitions and clarify links between ideas. For example, the move from enjoying a job and earning income to controlling stress is abrupt, while the connection between taking breaks and having a better relationship with a manager needs explanation. The phrase “This facts” also makes the reference unclear. Use more precise links that show how each example supports the paragraph’s main claim.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including terms such as “physical and mental stress,” “employees,” “authorities,” and “bridge of trust.” There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, which suits an academic essay. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, and these make parts of the argument less clear: “the salary is justifying the work,” “maintain our physical and mental stress in control,” and “a good amount of break” are examples. “Stessful” is also misspelled, and “logical demands” does not clearly express the intended meaning. Aim for precise, natural combinations of words and check spelling; this will make your ideas easier to understand.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including conditional structures such as “if the work is interesting…” and a result clause beginning “As a result.” The overall meaning is usually understandable, but errors recur in sentence construction and agreement. For example, “if … than only a person may want” has an incorrect conditional pattern, and “This facts is” has a mismatch between the demonstrative, noun, and verb. In “we should get a shorter hours,” the article and plural form do not agree; “it will better if it is done” is also missing a verb form. Practise building accurate conditional sentences and checking subject–verb agreement, articles, and singular/plural forms. Greater control of these patterns would make the argument more fluent.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.