Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

There is a debate on the number of working days a worker should have in a week. Some people believe that the working days should be lesser and employees should have a longer weekend. I agree with those who support longer weekend to some extent.

In most of the countries, employees work for nine hours a day. They get very limited time for self care, exercise, enough sleep and to spend with family. These are crucial things which have direct impact on the mental health of a person. A sound mind fosters the capabilities of the workers and ultimately leads to better performance. This is parallel to the overall health of workers' families specially childrens. This reinforces the process of a child's brain development whose benefits in their lives are beyond explanation. We can see evidence from the past, there has been greater improvement in many sectors on providing workers with two days in a weekend as compared to the first decade of the twenty-first century when workers had just given one day off.

Despite the advantages of long weekend, I do not agree that weekend should be longer than the working days. Too much relaxation sometimes slows down the progress and results in poor outcome. It is not only a loss for different departments but for people as well. For example, in health sector, many patients wait for their doctors during weekend. In case of education department, having a longer weekend can lessen the learning of students. In case of companies, they can face delay in projects which can result out-dated provision of goods and can not meet the supply on demand criterion.

In conclusion, there should be a balance between working days and days in a weekend. Different sectors should hire more staff to alternate shifts of the workers to avoid the problems which can cause inconvenience for people and loss for them.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you support a longer weekend to some extent, while rejecting a weekend that is longer than the working week. You address both sides with relevant reasons, including workers’ wellbeing and possible delays in healthcare, education and business. The examples help make your argument concrete. However, some claims are asserted rather than fully explained: the comparison with the past does not specify how a two-day weekend produced improvements, and the effects on children’s development are not clearly linked to shorter working hours. To strengthen the response, explain these cause-and-effect links and clarify what change you support—for example, a shorter working week with services maintained through shift arrangements.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your qualified position, the body paragraphs present benefits and drawbacks, and the conclusion proposes a balance. Ideas generally progress in a sensible order, and phrases such as “Despite the advantages” signal a shift in argument. This meets the expected level of coherent organisation. At times, however, connections are mechanical or unclear. “This is parallel to” does not clearly show how workers’ health relates to their families, while “This reinforces the process” has an uncertain reference. The final paragraph introduces hiring more staff without fully connecting this proposal to your position. Use more precise referencing and explain how each paragraph’s point supports your conclusion.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “mental health,” “performance,” “alternate shifts” and “supply on demand.” These choices help communicate the main ideas, and some less common expressions show an attempt to be precise. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “working days should be lesser,” “This is parallel to,” and “out-dated provision of goods.” There are also word-form or spelling issues, including “childrens.” These do not prevent understanding, but they limit precision and naturalness. Aim to learn common collocations as complete phrases and check word forms; for example, describe a “shorter working week” and “delays in the supply of goods.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including relative clauses (“whose benefits in their lives…”) and conditional structures (“which can result…”). Most ideas remain understandable, and the longer sentences show an effort to express relationships between causes and effects. Some grammatical errors persist, particularly with articles, agreement and sentence construction. For example, “there has been greater improvement” needs an article or plural form, and “a child's brain development whose benefits” creates an unclear grammatical link. In “they can face delay in projects which can result…,” the clause structure and punctuation need clearer control. Review articles and singular/plural agreement, and divide long sentences when their relationships become difficult to manage.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.