Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Some people believe that the working week should be shorter and employees should have a longer weekend. I partially agree with this statement.

On the one hand, some people agree that the working week for the employees should be shorter, so that they have a longer weekend. Furthermore, if the working week is shorter employees may work harder to meet the work deadlines. Individuals thought that if they complete the assigned tasks on time they can rest at the weekends. However, if the person rest for a long time they can reduce their stress and fatigue. Constant work may make the person sick, so if they rest properly they can work efficiently. For example, if a person work for four days and then rest for three days of the weekend, they may refreshed after getting back to work. Additionally, their productivity also increases.

On the other hand, some people believe that the working week should not be shorter. The employees should work for at least a week and may rest at the weekend for two days. If the individuals work for fewer hours, the organization may face financial losses because the employees might not be able to complete their assigned tasks on time. Moreover, some people think that if the workers rest for a long time, it will make it hard to get back to work. To address this issue, some companies allow employees to work remotely on certain days, which gives them greater flexibility while ensuring that their responsibilities are completed.

In conclusion, I partially agree that the working week should be shorter because it gives employees more time to rest and improves their productivity. However, companies should also consider their workload before making this change.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you partially agree, and the conclusion restates that shorter weeks can support rest and productivity while noting that workload matters. You address both sides and give relevant reasons, including stress, deadlines and possible effects on organisations. However, some points are not fully explained. For instance, the claim that fewer working hours may cause financial losses is asserted without showing how employers might be affected or considering whether output could remain stable. The four-day-work example supports your view, but its link to increased productivity could be developed with a specific explanation. To strengthen the response, explain the conditions under which a shorter week would work and support each main claim with a clearer example or consequence.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two contrasting body paragraphs and a conclusion. The progression from benefits to drawbacks is easy to follow, and signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand” and “In conclusion” make the organisation explicit. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent arrangement and also shows some stronger control through clear paragraphing and a consistent line of discussion. However, linking is sometimes mechanical, with repeated “if” clauses and repeated references to “some people.” The relationship between ideas is not always precise—for example, the point about resting for a long time reducing stress is followed by a broad claim about working efficiently. Use more varied transitions and make the cause-and-effect links between claims explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “work deadlines,” “stress and fatigue,” “productivity,” “financial losses” and “flexibility.” These choices make the discussion understandable and show attempts to express workplace concepts rather than relying only on basic words. Some phrasing is repetitive or imprecise, however: “working week” and “employees” recur often, while “rest for a long time” does not clearly convey the intended idea of having a longer weekend. There are also awkward collocations, such as “rest at the weekends” and “work for at least a week” when discussing a weekly schedule. Aim for more precise expressions and vary references to workers and working arrangements; this would make your argument sound more natural and exact.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex forms, including conditional sentences (“if the working week is shorter…”) and clauses introduced by “because” and “which.” Meaning is generally clear, but some errors in verb forms and agreement remain. For example, “if the person rest” should be “if the person rests,” and “if a person work” should be “if a person works.” In “they may refreshed,” the verb needs a form such as “may feel refreshed.” The sentence beginning “Individuals thought that” also shifts awkwardly into the past tense despite discussing a general belief. Review subject–verb agreement and modal verb patterns, and check tense consistency. More accurate control of these forms would strengthen the complex sentences you already attempt.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.