Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is often said that longer weekends should be available for workers while reducing the working days. This essay strongly diagrees with the statement because it will destroy the whole working schedule and workers will intend to show non serious behaviour.

A drop in working days will impose negative impact on progress by reducing working hours. If a company reduces its number of working days, working hours will also drop. Company will keep postponding the crucial meetings and will not be able to meet deadlines. This will ultimately lead to loss while damaging the reputation. A recent research in Japan, the most developed country, has shown that the people work 6 days a week and rest for only one day, making progress by leeps and bounds. This proves that a significant number of working days can lead to success.

In addition, longer weekends have negative impact as workers show an immature behaviour. The thought of longer weekend will influence them in such a way that thay will concentrate on planning their weekends rather than focusing on their work. This will lead to their unprofessional behaviour compromising the work's quality. A recent study proved that people who enjoy loon weekents are tend to lose focus easity than those who do not do so. This showed that people focus on things that amazes them more than work.

To conclude, I would say that shorter working days and longer weekends will not only drop a company's progress but it will also lead to worker's problematic behaviour. If this happens in a company, it will keep the candle buning at both ends.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction and conclusion: you disagree because shorter working weeks could harm company progress and workers’ focus. Both reasons are relevant, and the examples about deadlines and Japan help illustrate your argument. This meets the task’s main requirements. However, the support is uneven: the claim that workers would become less professional is asserted rather than convincingly explained, and the “recent study” about long weekends is vague and difficult to assess. The Japan example also assumes that working six days causes national progress without showing the connection. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation and a specific, credible example to make the response more fully supported.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present separate reasons, and a conclusion restates the position. The progression from reduced productivity to workers’ focus is easy to follow, and signposts such as “In addition” and “To conclude” help guide the reader. This is a coherent arrangement. Some connections are less secure, however: the move from fewer working days to postponed meetings and missed deadlines needs a clearer explanation, while the final sentence about “keeping the candle burning at both ends” does not clearly reinforce the preceding point. Referencing such as “This showed” is also vague. Use more precise links between claims and evidence, and ensure the conclusion’s final idea directly summarises your argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of topic-related vocabulary, including “working schedule,” “meet deadlines,” “reputation,” “unprofessional behaviour,” and “work’s quality.” These choices make your main ideas understandable, and you attempt more expressive phrases such as “leaps and bounds.” However, noticeable spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision: “diagrees,” “postponding,” “thay,” “loon weekents,” and “easity” appear in the response. Some combinations are also unnatural, such as “impose negative impact” and “immature behaviour” for the effect you describe. Aim for accurate, natural collocations and proofread spelling. More precise terms such as “reduce productivity” and “lose concentration” would express your points more clearly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional clauses (“If a company reduces its number of working days…”) and cause-and-effect structures (“This will ultimately lead to…”). The overall meaning is generally clear, but some grammatical errors affect accuracy. For example, “Company will keep” needs an article or plural subject, and “people … are tend to lose focus” has an incorrect verb construction. In “the people work 6 days a week,” the tense and article use are not well controlled for a general claim. There are also problems with possessives and agreement in “a company’s progress” and “worker’s problematic behaviour.” Review articles, subject–verb agreement, and verb patterns, while continuing to use varied sentence structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.