Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Employees are becomin concerned about amount of working days.Many workers nowadays are demanding to reduce working hours and enjoy a longer weekends. In my opinion, I strongly agree that workers should have enough time to enjoy and recover after a busy schedule.

The first reason is having less amount of days to rest is making them vulnerable to mental illness. Our body naturally needs enough time to rest and recover. Which means that not having a sufficient sleep can have a long-term consequence on workers mentl health. For instance, people who are required to work 10 hours a day might not have enough time to rest and this can disrupt their sleeping patterns. As a result, this can affect their mental well-being. So inorder to have a healthy life style they should be given a longer weekend to recover from exhaustion.

In addition, long working hours can also affect the relationship of individuals. Children or partner of workers need time to spend time together. However, if individuals are required to work everyday in the weekdays or have shorter weekends for enjoyement, they may not have sufficient time to spend with their families. This can lead them to have unsatisfactory romantic life.

In conclusion, although companies benefit from their employees who work for longer hours or from working everyday, in my opinion working hours should be shorter or employees should have a longer weekends. Because this can help workers to increase their work-life balance and to have a sufficient amount of time to spend with their families.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you strongly agree that workers need more time to recover. You address two relevant effects—mental well-being and family relationships—and support the first with an example about long shifts and disrupted sleep. This gives the response a relevant, purposeful argument. However, the reasons are not developed equally: the family-life point is brief, and the conclusion introduces companies’ benefits without explaining or weighing them. The task asks specifically about a shorter working week and a longer weekend, but the response sometimes shifts to reducing daily working hours, so the distinction could be addressed more directly. To strengthen the argument, explain how a shorter week or longer weekend would produce the benefits you identify and develop the second reason with a specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion. The progression from workers’ health to family relationships is easy to follow, and signposts such as “The first reason,” “In addition,” and “In conclusion” help readers identify each stage. This provides a coherent arrangement, though some linking is mechanical and a few connections are unclear. For example, “Which means that” is separated from the preceding sentence, while “So” begins another sentence that repeats the point about recovery. The family paragraph also moves quickly from time with children or a partner to an “unsatisfactory romantic life.” Use fewer formulaic transitions and connect each explanation more smoothly to its supporting example; clearer references to the proposed shorter week would also improve progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “mental well-being,” “sleeping patterns,” “work-life balance,” and “recover from exhaustion.” These phrases show some range beyond basic statements. However, noticeable spelling, word-form, and collocation problems reduce precision: “mentl health,” “inorder,” “enjoyement,” “less amount of days,” and “longer weekends” are examples. Some expressions are also awkward, such as “Children or partner of workers need time to spend time together” and “unsatisfactory romantic life.” Aim for accurate, natural combinations rather than adding more ambitious vocabulary. Proofread spelling and choose precise phrases such as “fewer days off,” “spend quality time with their families,” and “strain family relationships.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including cause-and-effect structures with “because,” “if,” and “as a result.” This helps express relationships between working patterns and their consequences. However, some grammatical errors remain, and sentence boundaries are not always controlled. For example, “Which means that not having a sufficient sleep…” is a fragment; it should be joined to the previous sentence. The opening “Employees are becomin concerned” has an incorrect verb form, and “Children or partner of workers need…” has problems with number and agreement. The final sentence beginning “Because” is also incomplete as written. Review sentence completeness, subject–verb agreement, articles, and singular/plural forms, while retaining your attempts at complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.