Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In this contemporary era, many people believed that companies should reduce working days, Whereas others think that worker should have a longer weekend. I completely agrre with this view because it increase productivity as well as reduce the pollution globally.

One of the primary reason to considered is, shorter working week (around 5 days week) provides relaxation to the employes which directly improve the productivity and also workers can manage work-life balance easily without stress. For Instance, If people work at office every day they can not be able to think out of the box and they just repeat regular task rather then think about how to increase efficiency as well productivity.

Another compeling reason for longer weekend to employee, firstly, it helps to reduce the pollution therefor,transportation hours and petrol cost saves by the employee as well as the CO2 emission due to the use of vehical for transportation get reduce which leads to control the environmental crisis. Secondly, If worker get a break between weeks that enhance the work efficiency of workeres becuase they fill focus and fresh after break as well they will support the production facility to complete target. Conversly, many organisation prefer no holidays to the worker and without break they feel tired and they work slowely. As a result, to provide longer weekend is essential to improve work efficiency of workers

In conclusion, Employee should get longer weekends and working week should be shorter for them because it enhance the performance of employee such as productivity and efficiency. Moreover transportation is also reduce which directly help to control pollution globally.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction (“I completely agree”) and maintained in the conclusion. You give relevant reasons about productivity, work-life balance and pollution, and the example of workers repeating routine tasks helps explain how rest might support efficiency. This addresses the task well, while the response does not develop every point equally: the pollution argument is asserted through reduced commuting and emissions, but would be stronger with a specific example or clearer explanation of how a longer weekend changes travel patterns. The phrase “shorter working week (around 5 days week)” also makes your proposal unclear, since five days is not clearly shorter than a standard week. Clarify the schedule you support and extend the less-developed points to make the argument more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, with each body paragraph focused on a reason for your position. Linking expressions such as “For instance,” “Secondly,” and “As a result” help signal examples and consequences. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. The second body paragraph moves from pollution to efficiency and then to organisations’ lack of holidays without clearly showing how these points relate. “Another compelling reason” is followed by “firstly” and “Secondly,” which makes the paragraph’s organisation harder to follow. Use clearer topic sentences and separate the environmental and productivity arguments, or connect them explicitly. More precise referencing would also help readers follow who “they” refers to in the final body paragraph.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “productivity,” “work-life balance,” “CO2 emission,” and “environmental crisis,” and you attempt some less common expressions such as “think out of the box.” This gives you enough range to communicate the main ideas, but inaccurate word choice, collocation and spelling are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause. Examples include “compeling reason,” “transportation hours,” “production facility,” and “fill focus,” where the intended meaning is not expressed naturally. Spelling errors such as “agrre,” “employes,” and “vehical” also reduce precision. Build accuracy by checking spelling and learning common word partnerships, especially for describing commuting, rest and workplace performance.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including clauses with “because,” “which,” and “if,” so there is some variety in structure. The main argument is generally understandable, but errors in agreement, verb forms, articles and sentence construction are frequent enough to affect clarity. For example, “it increase productivity” needs a verb agreeing with “it,” while “the CO2 emission … get reduce” has problems with both the verb form and passive construction. The opening sentence also joins contrasting ideas with an incorrectly capitalised “Whereas,” and several long sentences need clearer punctuation. Practise forming accurate subject–verb patterns and passive clauses, then review each sentence for complete structure and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.