Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The question of whether the less working days and longer weekend or the more working days and shorter weekend has sparked an intense social debate. I opine that the shorter working week and longer weekend is more beneficial, so I agree with the former opinion. In this essay both the positive and negative perspectives will be discussed in detail with the reasons.

To begin with, the longer weekend ( shorter number of working days ) is good choice because of many reason. First of all, the employees can spend more leisure time with their families, it will further create employee satisfaction. So, the employees will do work by heart and soul for their employer or organization, which will eventually create satisfactory products for the customers. Because of longer weekend, empolyee can take proper rest and after weekend, they join with relaxed and calm mindset, which is best for the quality of the products, so more customer will be attracted and sales can be expanded gradually.

On the flip side, every decision has some negative consequences. If the working days is reduced and weekend are longer than usual, it can lead to reduced productivity, so companies can not fulfill orders on time. So, production houses can lose their clients, which will directly affect the financial growth of the organization, while the salary burden still remains the same. All these negative results can reduce national economy as well.

In conclusion, having scrutinized both the views, the the positive outcomes still outweighs the negative consequences. So, I reaffirm that the longer weekend will create happiness and prosperity to the nation and the public.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction—“I agree with the former opinion”—and remains consistent in the conclusion. You address both the benefits and a possible drawback, with relevant reasoning about family time, employee rest, product quality, and companies’ ability to meet orders. This gives the response a sound basis and covers the question. However, the discussion is framed as a general review of “both the positive and negative perspectives,” rather than developing your agreement in depth. The productivity concern is introduced but not weighed against the benefits or answered, and claims such as improved sales and national prosperity need a specific example or fuller explanation. Develop fewer points more fully and show why the benefits outweigh the costs.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph for benefits, a paragraph for drawbacks, and a conclusion. The progression from employee wellbeing to possible business effects is generally easy to follow, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “On the flip side,” and “In conclusion” help readers navigate the argument. At times, however, linking is mechanical or repetitive: “So” begins several consecutive sentences, and “because of” is repeated in the benefits paragraph. Some connections between claims are also abrupt, particularly the move from employee satisfaction to product quality and sales. Use a wider range of linking methods, make cause-and-effect relationships explicit, and ensure each paragraph develops one central point smoothly.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “employee satisfaction,” “productivity,” “financial growth,” and “negative consequences.” These choices make the main ideas clear, and phrases such as “relaxed and calm mindset” show an attempt to express more specific meanings. However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, including “do work by heart and soul,” “satisfactory products,” and “salary burden still remains the same.” There are also spelling errors such as “empolyee,” alongside repeated general terms such as “good,” “create,” and “negative.” Aim for more natural collocations and precise wording, and proofread spelling; this would make the vocabulary more flexible and controlled.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional structures such as “If the working days is reduced…” and clauses explaining consequences. This shows some range, and the overall meaning is usually understandable. Some grammatical errors remain, however, particularly with agreement, articles, plurals, and sentence boundaries. For example, “the working days is reduced” should use a plural verb, while “weekend are longer” also needs agreement; “is good choice” is missing an article. The opening sentence has an awkward comparison structure, and several long sentences join independent clauses with commas, as in “the employees can spend more leisure time with their families, it will further create employee satisfaction.” Practise accurate clause joining and check agreement and articles.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.