Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In this contemporary world, the question of weekend after the working day is a matter of growing debate.A growing number of people argued that empolyes should have a longer vacations as compared to working days in a week.I firmly disagree with this view due to work load in an organization and consistency behaviour of humans.This essay will explore my reasons.

The first and most compelling reason why I disagree is that organization faces a work pressure due to demanding era in every field. Although there are many brands or companies for a single product but over population demands a variety of things at a same time since companies have to pay off their demands and sometimes take overtime from the workers.

Another reason for my view is that consistency behaviour in human being.If individual works more days than weekend ,then they built a potential and motivation to do work regularly. Moreover, if empolyes get long break they may distracked and loss interest in their assignment.Since, From my perspective, government should give only one or two day off after a working week because everything needs a balance to work properly.

To sum up, for the reasons outlines above, namely consistency behaviour and work load, I firmly disagree that weekend should be longer than week days to maintain or fulfill the demands and work effeciently with consistency.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you disagree with a longer weekend, and you give two relevant reasons—workplace demands and the effect of long breaks on workers’ motivation. However, these ideas are only partly developed. For example, the claim that companies face pressure because of population demand is broad, and you do not explain why a shorter working week is necessary to meet that demand. The point about workers becoming distracted after a long break would also benefit from a specific example or clearer explanation. The conclusion restates your view, but the response does not fully develop its supporting arguments. It is also 25 words below the required minimum, so add relevant explanation and examples rather than padding.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a concluding summary. This makes your position easy to follow. You also use signposting such as “Another reason” and “To sum up.” However, some links are mechanical or unclear. For instance, “Moreover” introduces a related consequence without showing the connection in detail, while “Since, From my perspective” creates an awkward transition. The first body paragraph also moves quickly from competition between companies to population demand and overtime. Improve progression by explaining each point in sequence and using clearer references between claims. More developed paragraphing would help the reader see how each reason supports your position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “work pressure,” “overtime,” “motivation,” and “demands,” and these choices help communicate your main ideas. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “the most compelling reason.” However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors make parts less natural or harder to understand. Examples include “consistency behaviour,” “longer vacations” when discussing weekends, and “pay off their demands.” Spelling errors such as “empolyes,” “distracked,” and “effeciently” are noticeable. Aim for precise topic vocabulary and check spelling; using familiar words accurately is more effective than forcing unnatural phrases.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a concession beginning “Although” and a conditional structure with “if.” However, the range is limited, and complex sentences are often not controlled accurately. For example, “Although there are many brands or companies … but” combines two contrasting structures, while “If individual works more days … then they built” has problems with articles, agreement, and verb form. Sentence boundaries and punctuation also need attention: “debate.A growing” lacks a space, and “human being.If” runs two sentences together. These errors sometimes make the reader pause to interpret your meaning. Practise building accurate sentences first, then vary structures while checking agreement, articles, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.