Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Sometime people argue that their should be less weekdays and more weekend days. I strongly agree with this view because it helps employees to give time to their familys and it also helps people to keep themselves fresh and relax.

The main reason is that due to longer weekdays employees can not give time to their familys. This is because in many countries there are only two days off in a week and on the weekdays they come very late at night. As a result, they do not have enough time to spend with their families. For example, an employee working in a IT based company only get 2 days off per week and also sometimes even when he comes home, he get calls from the company, which results in fewer opportunities to spend time with friends and family. Therefore, longer weekends can help people to have enoguh time to stay with their families.

Another important reason is that it keeps people fresh and also keeps their energy levels high. This is because nowadays, people often need to be creative at their work and need high energy levels. If they do not get enough rest time, they might lose their creativity as well. For example, an employee that works in a IT company often needs to be creative at their work. if they do not get enough time to relax they might not perform well at the job. As a result, longer weekends can also help make people creative.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that longer weekends is a better option. This is becuase it keeps the employee fresh and feel relaxed and it also lead to enough time to spend with their family.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction (“I strongly agree”) and remains consistent in the conclusion. You give two relevant reasons: more time with family and better rest, energy and creativity. The examples about an IT-company employee help illustrate these points, so the response addresses the question. However, the ideas are not developed equally or in much depth. The family paragraph explains the problem of late working hours, but could clarify how a shorter working week would change workers’ schedules. The second paragraph repeats the claim that rest supports creativity without exploring other effects or providing a distinct, detailed example. To strengthen the response, explain the practical benefits and possible implications of a shorter week, and extend each example with specific outcomes.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion. The progression from family time to rest and creativity is easy to follow, and signposts such as “The main reason,” “Another important reason,” and “In conclusion” make the organisation apparent. However, these transitions are somewhat mechanical, and “This is because” and “As a result” recur in similar ways. Some references are also unclear or inconsistent: “they” can refer to employees or people generally, while the examples shift between “an employee” and “they.” Use a wider range of linking methods, and make pronoun references precise. Developing each paragraph through a clear claim, explanation and specific example would also make the progression smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including relevant terms such as “energy levels,” “creativity,” and “opportunities.” The meaning is generally clear, but the range is repetitive, with frequent reliance on “time,” “people,” “employees,” “help,” and “longer weekends.” Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or informal, such as “keep themselves fresh and relax,” “give time to their familys,” and “at their work.” Spelling errors, including “enoguh” and “becuase,” also reduce accuracy. Aim for more precise expressions for work-life balance and recovery, and check spelling and word forms carefully. More varied vocabulary would help you explain the effects of a shorter working week without repeating the same phrases.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use both simple sentences and longer structures, including cause-and-effect clauses with “because” and conditional sentences beginning “If they do not get enough rest time.” These structures help express your reasoning, and the message remains understandable. However, some errors in agreement, articles, and verb forms persist. For example, “an employee … only get” should use a singular verb, and “longer weekends is” should be “longer weekends are.” In “it also lead,” the verb should agree with the singular subject, while “an IT based company” needs an article and more accurate noun phrasing. There are also punctuation issues, such as starting “if” with a lowercase letter after a full stop. Review subject–verb agreement and proofread sentence boundaries while continuing to practise varied complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.