Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Working is an integral part of life and as important as eating is. Some people contend that duration of working week should be reduced and employers weekend holidays should be increased. I disagree with this view due to fact that will results in financial strain on businesses and cause operational disruptions.

More week holidays will lead to do more work work in week days which will ultimately put workload on employers. Secondly longer weekend will affect companies as they will have to hire additional staff to complete their week works which will put financial stress on businesses. When business will suffer loss this will slower the economical development of nation as when businesses grows more tax are collected from them by government which are then used for country economic growth and development.

Furthermore , shorter week would create critical disruptions across many global sectors. Many public sectors like emergency services, transportation and health field needs seven days coverage and closure of any such service for even one day is impossible so in that way shorter week theory seems impossible for millions of workers. Many corporate institutes are working on five days working model and if we try to put their work in four days working model this will cause fatigue and more burden on workers in weekdays. Secondly, many public and private institutes takes already 2 days off if we increase their holidays then public will have less days in week to solve their problems from them and will cause operational disruptions.

In conclusion, longer weekends looks very appealing in theories but in practical it is impossible in practical life, reducing working days are economically drastic and are not in favor of many vital sectors. Therefore, I believe maintaining the traditional five-day workweek is necessary to preserve business stability and consistent service delivery.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction (“I disagree”) and remains consistent in the conclusion. You address the question with two relevant lines of reasoning: possible financial pressure on businesses and the need for continuous services in sectors such as healthcare, transport and emergency response. These points support your view, but some are asserted rather than fully explained. For example, the claim that longer weekends would require businesses to hire additional staff would be stronger with a specific explanation of which workplaces need extra coverage. The economic-development point is also difficult to follow and could be linked more directly to shorter working weeks. Develop each main reason with a clear example or consequence to make the argument more convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting reasons, and a conclusion that restates your position. The progression from business costs to service coverage is generally logical, and signposts such as “Furthermore” help readers follow the argument. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. “Secondly” appears again within the second body paragraph, while the relationship between business losses, tax revenue and national development is not clearly expressed. The phrase “public will have less days in week to solve their problems from them” also makes the point difficult to follow. Use clearer topic sentences and connect each supporting explanation explicitly to the paragraph’s main claim.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “financial strain,” “operational disruptions,” “emergency services,” and “service delivery.” These choices show an effort to discuss the economic and practical effects of a shorter week. However, inaccurate word choice and collocation sometimes make the meaning awkward, as in “week works,” “economical development,” and “longer weekends looks very appealing in theories.” There is also repetition of “work” and “businesses,” and some phrases are imprecise, such as “public and private institutes” where “institutions” or “organisations” would be more natural. Aim for accurate, natural combinations of words and check word forms and spelling, especially in key claims.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “which” and “as,” and the overall meaning is usually understandable. Some grammatical errors, however, recur in verb forms, agreement, articles and sentence construction. For example, “this will slower” should use the base verb after “will,” while “businesses grows more tax are collected” has problems with agreement and clause structure. In “services … needs seven days coverage,” the plural subject requires a plural verb. There are also missing or misplaced articles and punctuation, such as the comma spacing in “Furthermore ,”. Review subject–verb agreement and the structure of sentences with multiple clauses, then proofread for articles and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.