Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is thought that the number of office days in a week should be reduced and employees ought to get more weekends. While I believe that longer days off are beneficial for workers, I strongly disagree on the statement that working days should be shorter and workers should have longer weekend because of certain reasons.

Firstly, if the weekdays are reduced for all professions in a country it would significantly impact the service receivers and the quality of service received. For instance, healthcare sector is a crucial sector where healthcare providers treats patients at hospitals and clinics. If doctors take longer days off in private and government clinics, patients can not receive desired treatment from interns or nurses because of their less experience compared to specialists. This could potentially degrade the health condition of patients.

Moreover, shorter weekdays will affect the economic and financial sector of a country enormously if the longer weekend policy gets approved. For example, in Bangladesh longer holidays are approved by policymakers during festivals of different communities living there during which banking services also remain closed as bankers do not perform duty. People from remote area do not have access to ATM booth for which they must depend on face to face banking services. As a result, customers living in villages can not visit banks to get service like cash withdrawal during longer public holidays.

In conclusion, lessening the office days in a week will not be a sustainable policy as it could adversely affect our life both personally and financially.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you disagree with shortening the working week, and both body paragraphs give relevant reasons. The examples about healthcare access and banking during festivals help connect your argument to practical consequences. However, the healthcare point is developed more fully than the financial argument, which focuses mainly on access to cash during holidays rather than explaining the broader economic impact claimed in the topic sentence. The opening also briefly acknowledges that longer days off can benefit workers, but you do not explain why this benefit is outweighed by the disadvantages. Develop each main claim with a clearer explanation and make the comparison between workers’ benefits and public costs more explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two reason-led body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Sequencing is easy to follow, and signposts such as “Firstly,” “Moreover,” and “In conclusion” make the progression clear. This meets the lower-band expectation for coherent organisation and also shows some stronger control through focused paragraphing and relevant examples. To make cohesion more flexible and less dependent on formulaic transitions, connect ideas within paragraphs more explicitly. For example, explain how reduced working days would lead to the specific service disruption described, and clarify the link between festival closures and the policy being discussed. The phrase “longer days off” in the introduction could also be tied more clearly to the essay’s central position.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “service receivers,” “healthcare providers,” “financial sector,” and “public holidays,” and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “adversely affect” and “sustainable policy.” Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or imprecise, however: “get more weekends” and “longer weekend” are awkward, while “service receivers” is less natural than “service users” or “customers.” “Economic and financial sector” is also redundant, and “face to face banking services” could be expressed more precisely. Aim for natural collocations and avoid repeating broad terms such as “sector” when a more specific description is available.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex forms, including conditional structures (“If doctors take longer days off…”) and a relative clause (“during which banking services also remain closed”). These allow you to explain causes and consequences, and the overall meaning remains understandable. Some grammatical errors persist, particularly with subject–verb agreement and articles: “healthcare providers treats” should be “healthcare providers treat,” and “in healthcare sector” needs an article or a different construction. There are also issues with plural and sentence structure in “longer weekend” and “people from remote area.” Review agreement, article use, and plural forms, then proofread longer sentences to ensure each clause is clearly and accurately connected.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.