Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Employeers should have a prolonged weekend in comparison to working week and I am in favour of this idea.This essay will enlighten the opinions below.

Firstly a good and long holiday brings more productivity in an employeer work.Workers working in firms usually go through constant stress and workload which drains their energy and as a result they become less efficient and it can be evident in their poor performances.Example most of the bigger firms around the world provide extra holidays and even arrange group tours on weekends once a month to provide some comfort to the workers who had been working rigriously and as result the it gives workers a fresh start they work with more dedication and interest after the weekend.

A long working week is tiresome and giving the workers an option of work from home by reducing physical working week suits more employeers because everybody enjoy comfort.Most of the firms apply this startegy on their workers by reducing their working week and providing a longer weekend but demand a work from home and observe significant progress because the employees work more efficiently in a comfy bed rather than sitting straight on a stiff chair so weekends should be made longer with a demand of work from home.

However some people believe that weekends should not be longer because it is one way of exposure and socializing.People who suffer from some sort of depression or lonliness feel better when they are surrounded by people and are busy in work mostly in offices.Also staying longer at home can reduce communication, presentation and marketing skills which are important in the global market competition and these skills are constantly polished when exposed to differnt people physically in offices so longer working weeks are preferable from such people.

Although longer weekends are mostly liked by people some may oppose but personally I am a strong advocate of weekends should of multiple days .

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you support a shorter working week and longer weekends, and you give relevant reasons about productivity and stress. You also acknowledge an opposing view, explaining that office contact can help people who feel isolated and can develop communication skills. This coverage, together with examples such as firms arranging group tours, addresses the task well. However, the support is uneven: the productivity point is explained more fully, while the work-from-home argument relies on broad claims, such as employees working better “in a comfy bed,” without showing how this relates to a shorter week. To strengthen the response further, explain how the proposed change would work and develop the counterargument before clearly weighing it against your own position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, supporting paragraphs, a counterargument, and a conclusion. Sequencing words such as “Firstly,” “However,” and “Although” help signal the direction of the discussion. Some connections are less clear or mechanical, though. The second body paragraph moves from reducing the working week to working from home, without clearly explaining whether these are alternatives or parts of the same proposal. Long sentences also make relationships between ideas harder to follow, particularly in the paragraph about stress and productivity. The conclusion repeats your preference but does not summarise the main reasons. Use clearer topic sentences, divide complex points into shorter units, and make references such as “this strategy” explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “productivity,” “workload,” “efficiently,” “socializing,” and “communication skills,” which allows you to discuss both benefits and drawbacks. There are also attempts at more specific expressions, such as “constant stress” and “global market competition.” However, several inaccurate word choices, collocations, and spelling errors reduce precision: “prolonged weekend,” “employeer,” “rigriously,” and “comfy bed” are either unsuitable or incorrectly formed for this formal essay. Some wording is also repetitive, especially references to “longer weekends” and “workers.” Aim for natural academic collocations and check spelling carefully; for example, describe a “longer weekend” and employees working “under considerable pressure” rather than relying on informal or awkward phrasing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “because,” “which,” and “although.” This gives the response some structural variety, and the main argument is generally understandable. However, errors in sentence boundaries, agreement, articles, and clause construction recur. For instance, “This essay will enlighten the opinions below” is an awkwardly formed sentence, while “everybody enjoy comfort” has an agreement error. The sentence beginning “Example most of the bigger firms” lacks a clear grammatical link to the previous point, and several sentences run together without appropriate punctuation. Work on constructing complete sentences, checking subject–verb agreement and articles, and using full stops to separate ideas. More accurate control of these patterns would make your complex sentences easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.