Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Now a days it is often argue that working week should be shorter and employee should have a longer weekend. I completely agree that workers should have longer weekend so I will dicuss my point of views in proper detail.

First of all, a longer weekend provides to the worker spend more time for family, reduce stress and improve mental health. beacuse, Many people have busy schedules during week they can not manage their personal responsibilities as well as they cannot focus on extra activities like music, books which is thier hobbies the can reduce stress and create better balance between work and personal life. For example, worker who have enougt time to rest may feel better they can do excercise and participates into activities as well as feel fresh.

On the other hand, Shorter working weeks may improve the productivity. when people work long time without rest, they can become tired and lose concentration, As a result they make mistakes in thier tasks, In contrast well rested employess are often more focused, energetic and motivated.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that the working week should be shorter and weekends should be lon

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

Your position is clear: you agree that workers should have a longer weekend, and you give relevant reasons, including family time, reduced stress, and improved productivity. However, the response addresses the task only partially because these points are briefly stated rather than explained with specific support. For instance, the example about a rested worker exercising is general, and the productivity paragraph does not explain how a shorter week could maintain or improve output. The conclusion is also cut off, so it does not fully restate your argument. The response is 57 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop your ideas. Extend each main point with a clear explanation and a specific example, and finish the conclusion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall arrangement: an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The ideas are grouped sensibly, with personal benefits in the first body paragraph and productivity in the second. Linking phrases such as “First of all,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help signal this structure. However, the contrast introduced by “On the other hand” is not fully clear, since productivity supports your position rather than presenting an opposing view. Some sentences also contain several ideas joined together, making the progression harder to follow. Use clearer links between each claim and its explanation, and divide long sentences into more manageable units. The unfinished final sentence also weakens the sense of closure.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “reduce stress,” “mental health,” “productivity,” “concentration,” and “motivated.” These choices make your main ideas understandable. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, spelling, and collocation errors reduce precision, such as “point of views,” “manage their personal responsibilities,” “participates into activities,” and “enougt.” Repetition of “worker” and “time” also makes the writing less varied. Aim to use more precise phrases for the effects of shorter working weeks, and check spelling and common word partnerships carefully. For example, “take part in activities” is more natural than “participates into activities,” while “work-life balance” expresses one of your ideas concisely.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a reason clause beginning “when people work long time without rest” and a result clause introduced by “As a result.” This shows an effort to connect ideas, but control is inconsistent, and errors sometimes make the reader pause. Examples include “it is often argue” instead of a correctly formed passive, “a longer weekend provides to the worker spend more time,” and “worker who have,” where the sentence structure and agreement are faulty. Several sentences also run together or use punctuation inconsistently, as in the long sentence about hobbies and stress. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement, verb forms, and sentence boundaries, then proofread each sentence for a clear subject and main verb.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.