Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is often said that the work days should be reduced to provide a longer weekend to employees. Although a long weekend can affect productivity and economic growth, more off days can play a key role to make an employee stress-free and concentrated towards work. I agree that one or two more non-working day can help employees to be more active and enthusiastic in their work.

Supporters of more work days point to the reduction of economic growth. In many offices, employees have to work for 5-6 days a week and 8-9 hours a day. During this working week, many personnel suffer from stress and anxiety due to excess workload. They eagerly wait for a off day to remove their tiredness. As a consequence, after 3 to 4 continuous working days, they often loose their concentration which result in the production of the sector. For instance, In Bangladesh some employees create fake medical documents to manage leave in order to reduce their stress.

To address this issue, increasing non working day can be good solution. Four working days per week and three off days can help service holders to reduce workload and stress. Gap between continuous work days will allow them to spend more times with family which is a good for their mental health. As a result, both concentration and enthusiasm might be found during their work which will be helpful for company's growth.

In conclusion, increasing off days can help to reduce mental pressure and therefore I largly agree this statement.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you agree that a shorter working week and longer weekend can benefit employees. You address both the concern about economic productivity and the benefits of additional rest, and the example of workers in Bangladesh seeking leave supports your discussion. This meets the task well, though the development is uneven. The productivity concern is introduced as an opposing view, but its consequences are not explored in much detail, and the example of fake medical documents illustrates stress more directly than it proves that a shorter week would improve productivity. To strengthen the response, explain more fully how the proposed schedule could maintain or improve output, and develop the link between rest, concentration and company performance with a specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction states your view, the second paragraph presents a concern, the third explains your preferred solution, and the conclusion restates your position. Linking expressions such as “As a consequence,” “To address this issue,” and “As a result” help show relationships between ideas. This gives the essay a coherent progression, although some connections feel mechanical or are not fully supported. For example, the move from employees losing concentration to “the production of the sector” is unclear, and the final paragraph repeats the central point without adding a concluding implication. Make the relationship between each claim and its evidence more explicit, and use referencing and transitions that connect ideas naturally rather than relying mainly on formulaic signposts.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “productivity,” “economic growth,” “workload,” “concentration,” and “enthusiasm.” These choices make your main ideas understandable, and you attempt more specific expressions such as “mental pressure.” However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, including “a off day,” “reduce their tiredness,” “production of the sector,” and “more times with family.” There are also spelling errors, such as “loose” for “lose” and “largly” for “largely.” These do not prevent understanding, but they limit precision. Build accuracy by learning common word partnerships and checking spelling, and choose expressions that describe the intended meaning directly, such as “output” rather than “production” in this context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including subordinate clauses beginning “Although” and “which,” and most ideas remain understandable. Some grammatical errors persist, however. For example, “one or two more non-working day can help” has a number-agreement problem, while “they often loose their concentration which result” contains errors in both the verb form and clause agreement. Article and determiner use also needs attention in “a off day” and “can be good solution.” The sentence “Gap between continuous work days will allow them to spend more times with family” shows further difficulty with articles and noun forms. Review agreement, articles and singular/plural forms, then proofread complex sentences to ensure each clause is grammatically complete and clearly connected.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.