Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

It is argued that weekend should be longer and the number of working days should be minimize. I completely agree with this view because develop efficiency of worker in many fields.

There are several advatages of having longer weekend to both employees and employers. For the employers, it may reduce their utility expenses such as electricity, water and maintence cost because the number of working days are reduced. For the employees, they can spend more time with their families, which will positively affect their mental- wellbeing. In addition, transportation cost may reduce, suppporting their economy. As a result, long weekend improve their quality of life.

However, not every field that follow this rules due to different operational requirement. For example, Industries such as IT and software may easily adopt with this working arrangement, whereas it may difficult for industries such as food industry to follow it because they need to maintain a continuous supply of product according to the demand. On the other hand, employees may face a heavy work load because they have to com

As a results, they may feel burn out

Diadvtantages

employers- change , according the field

Not every filed that follow this rules. IT okay food industry

employeer - they have work load , might cause burn out

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

Your position is clear in the introduction: “I completely agree,” and you give relevant reasons, including lower operating costs, more family time, and possible differences between industries. However, the response only partially develops the argument. The point about transportation costs is brief, and the discussion of food-industry requirements and employee workload is left unfinished; the final body paragraph ends mid-sentence before the conclusion. The notes under “Disadvantages” do not form a developed response. The required minimum of 250 words is not met, which further limits how fully you can explain and support your ideas. To strengthen the response, complete each point with an explanation or example and add a conclusion that restates your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 3.5

There is an attempt to organise the response into an introduction and body paragraphs, and linking expressions such as “In addition,” “As a result,” and “For example” help show relationships between ideas. However, progression is disrupted by the unfinished sentence “because they have to com,” the abrupt line “As a results,” and the separate, note-like “Diadvtantages” section. The second paragraph also shifts from industry differences to workload without completing the connection. Some links are unclear or repetitive, and the response has no conclusion to bring the argument together. Use complete paragraphs with one clear focus each, connect each example to the main position, and remove planning notes before submitting.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “utility expenses,” “continuous supply,” “operational requirement,” and “mental well-being.” These choices show an attempt to discuss both workplace costs and employee welfare. However, spelling errors and inaccurate word forms are noticeable, for example “advatages,” “maintence,” “suppporting,” and “burn out.” Some phrases are also imprecise or unnatural, such as “supporting their economy” and “adopt with this working arrangement.” The repeated use of “working days,” “employees,” and “industry” limits the range. Aim for accurate collocations and check spelling; for instance, say “reduce employees’ commuting costs” rather than “transportation cost may reduce.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “which will positively affect their mental well-being” and a contrast between industries using “whereas.” However, errors occur frequently and sometimes make the meaning difficult to follow. Examples include “the number of working days should be minimize,” “the number of working days are reduced,” and “it may difficult,” which show problems with verb forms, agreement, and missing verbs. The final sentence is incomplete, and “As a results” also has an agreement error. Practise checking subject–verb agreement, articles, and complete sentence structure. Build accuracy in shorter sentences first, then extend them with subordinate clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.