Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-08-23

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

These days, there has been lot of talk about longer weekend. This essay will delve deeper into the possible punitive reasons, viewpoints, overviews, and advantages causing this scenario before presenting my school of thought in the ensuing paragraphs with sufficient and relevant examples.

At first glance, there are several reasons in support of my context, but the most obvious one is that worker have more time for family, friends, hobbies, and personal activities. they can spend more time relaxing instead of constantly working. For example, one survey conducted by " The Daily News " revealed that the majority of people are responsible for this phenomenon, while only a few are aware of it. As a result, it is clear why a large number of people agree with the aforementioned position.

My point is further supported by that fewer working days reduce stress, tiredness, and burnout, due to which employees may return to work felling more refreshed. Well-rested employees may be more focused and productive during working hours. A famous non-governmental organization has been working to overcome this situation, and they suggest that the government needs to spread awareness and educate people for the betterment of society. Thus, this will not only raise living standards but also make individuals more cautions and practical in their approach.

On the other hand, if working hour reduce without maintaining salaries, some employees could earn less money. This could be difficult for people living in high expenses. Some businesses need to operate every day, such as hospital, transport, hotels, and restaurants. If companies have to maintain same level of service, they may need to hire additional employees. This will led to increase labour costs.

To recapitulate, it may be argued that, even though there are many causes, overviews, viewpoints, arguments, pros as well as negative of longer weekend. Lastly, it seems to me that it is wise idea to use such options, and they are pragmatic as well for a human being on Earth. In order to foster global wealth, productivity, and a fine environment, citizens are urged to abide by the relevant laws and regualtions.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The essay addresses the prompt and maintains a clear position throughout. However, the development of ideas is somewhat uneven. While the benefits of a shorter week are explained, the supporting evidence—such as the reference to a survey by 'The Daily News'—is vague and lacks real-world substance. The counter-argument regarding economic costs is relevant but could be more deeply explored. The introduction is cluttered with unnecessary meta-language (e.g., 'punitive reasons, viewpoints, overviews'), which detracts from the clarity of the argument. To improve, focus on providing more specific, logical examples rather than generic references.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear progression of ideas from the introduction to the conclusion. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'At first glance,' 'My point is further supported by,' and 'On the other hand.' However, some transitions feel mechanical or slightly misused, such as the phrase 'punitive reasons' in the introduction, which does not fit the context. Additionally, the concluding paragraph is somewhat repetitive and lacks a strong summary of the main points, instead relying on vague generalizations about 'global wealth' and 'laws and regulations.'

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but there is a tendency to use words incorrectly or in ways that sound unnatural. For example, 'punitive reasons' is misused, and 'cautions' is used instead of 'cautious.' There are also some spelling errors, such as 'regualtions' and 'felling' (instead of 'feeling'). While the student attempts to use a range of vocabulary, the lack of precision and the occasional misuse of academic terms limit the score. Using more precise collocations would significantly improve the quality of the writing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally distract the reader. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues ('worker have,' 'working hour reduce'), missing articles ('in high expenses'), and awkward phrasing ('This will led to increase labour costs'). While these errors do not completely impede communication, they occur frequently enough to prevent a higher band score. To improve, focus on proofreading for basic subject-verb agreement and ensuring that complex sentence structures are grammatically sound.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.