Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-08-23

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The job-going week should be slightly reduced and employees should have a prolonged weekend. I completely disagree with this argument because it will mean reduced productivity as well as laxity among workers.

To begin with, having a shorter week and longer weekends will lead to reduced productivity in the work environment. There will be less time to perform certain duties and beat deadlines due to the limited time frame. Furthermore, the results produced will not be satisfactory since there will be inadequate time for identifying and solving emerging problems in the workplace. For example, Miss Pretty, a language teacher in a public school will not have enough time to go through her learner's essays and get to give feedback on time and therefore, identifying learners with weakspots won't be easy, leading to poor performance at the end of the term.

Consequently, employees with longer weekends and shorter work days will be very relaxed . Laxity will be on the rise as more workers will have extra time for themselves instead of attaining their goals at their work places. Moreover, Individuals will always be looking forward to when the weekend starts and begin planning for it instead of concentrating on what brings food to their tables. For instance, Leleti ,a young vibrant lady in her mid twenties working for one of the insurance companies in the city is always on her social media accounts updating her followers about her weekend escapades instead of serving customers who are on the long queue hence giving the company a bad reputation.

In summary, the working week should not be shortened and employees should not be given longer weekends as it will reduce productivity and bring laxity at the work place.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response clearly states a position against shortening the working week and maintains this stance throughout. The ideas are relevant and supported by examples, such as the teacher struggling to provide feedback and the insurance worker distracted by social media. However, the development is somewhat limited; the arguments rely on generalizations about worker behavior rather than exploring broader economic or psychological implications. While the task is addressed, the depth of analysis is somewhat restricted, keeping it within the Band 6 range. To reach a higher band, you should aim to provide more nuanced arguments that consider counter-perspectives or broader societal impacts beyond individual workplace performance.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear central theme. Cohesive devices such as 'To begin with', 'Furthermore', 'Consequently', and 'In summary' are used to guide the reader through the argument. However, some transitions feel slightly mechanical, and the flow between sentences could be smoother. For instance, the transition from the teacher example to the general point about laxity is a bit abrupt. The use of referencing is generally clear, though the paragraphing is quite standard. Overall, the progression of ideas is logical and easy to follow, meeting the requirements for a Band 6 or 7, with 6.5 being a fair reflection of the current structure.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is adequate for the task, allowing the writer to express their ideas clearly. There are some attempts at less common collocations, such as 'vibrant lady' and 'weekend escapades', which add a degree of variety. However, there are some awkward phrasings, such as 'job-going week' and 'laxity will be on the rise', which sound slightly unnatural. The range of vocabulary is sufficient to convey the intended meaning, but it lacks the precision and sophistication required for higher bands. To improve, focus on learning more academic collocations and avoiding informal or slightly non-standard phrasing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is always clear, there are recurring grammatical issues, such as inconsistent comma usage (e.g., 'Furthermore, the results') and minor errors in article usage or prepositional phrases. Some sentences are slightly clunky, such as 'get to give feedback on time'. Despite these errors, the grammar does not impede communication. To move to a higher band, you should focus on increasing the frequency of error-free complex sentences and refining punctuation, particularly regarding spacing and comma placement after introductory phrases.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.