Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In today's rapidly evolving world, pro-longed working hours have become prevalent on account of escalated cost of living. While, a substantial number of individuals assert that working hours ought to be less, and emplyees should have a huge number of holidays. I partly agree with this view, beacuse having longer holiday can provides a siginificant amount of quality time to devote with family members, however, people can get low salary along with less opportunities of promotion.

To commence with, proponent emphasis the view concerning of getting a considerable number of spare time. This is because they can spend quality time with their family, which allows them to stay refreshed, relexed and productive. As a consequence, it contibute to alleviate their work pressure.

Moreover, a significant amount of leisure time can be indispensable, for working-individuals who desire to pursue their hobbies and learn other vocational courses. By means of this is, youngsters who have fascination for sport activities and learning other practical skills, Hence, by playing sports games, they can not only boost their immune system but also enhance resilience, persistence and consistency. Moreover, learning practical skills including technological adaptation can also be vital for beneficial working environment.

By contrast, working pro-longed hours has become as essential for individuals, especially for adolescents due to intensed competetion among peers, and fulfill requirements of family members. Due to the fact that if they not work for sufficient hours, they will not get beneficial amount of remuneration. For instance, According to the report of the organisation called WWO-World Wide Organisation, the US citizens have held the first rank in the index of the standard of living, since native american work five days a week. Furthermore, if workers get back to work after spending an enormous amount of time doing curricular activities they may not maintain efficiency at the workplace, and their tasks can become tedious and monotonous to them.

To conclude, although dimished working hours can assist individuals to stay relaxed and refresh, working more particularly overtime can offer a vast amount of disposable income. Therefore, i reckon employees ought to work according to their capabilities, potential, and requirements.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses all parts of the task by presenting a clear position and discussing both sides of the argument, such as the benefits of increased leisure time versus the necessity of longer working hours for financial stability and career progression. The ideas are generally well-extended, with examples provided, such as the mention of WWO-World Wide Organisation. However, some arguments lack complete development and tend to over-generalise, particularly in the body paragraphs where sentence structures become slightly fragmented. Despite these minor lapses, the student successfully covers the prompt and maintains a consistent stance throughout. Therefore, the performance aligns well with Band 6.0 descriptors.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with clear paragraphing, dividing the introduction, two body paragraphs, and the conclusion appropriately. Cohesive devices are employed to guide the reader, using phrases like 'To commence with', 'Moreover', and 'By contrast'. However, cohesion is occasionally faulty or mechanical. For instance, the sentence starting with 'By means of this is, youngsters...' demonstrates a breakdown in logical linking and grammatical cohesion. Referencing and transitional phrasing occasionally feel forced rather than natural. Paragraph progression is generally logical, leading from personal benefits to economic drawbacks, satisfying the criteria for a Band 6.0.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The student attempts a range of vocabulary appropriate for an academic discussion, incorporating terms like 'prevalent', 'indispensable', 'remuneration', and 'disposable income'. However, there are noticeable spelling and word choice errors throughout the text, such as 'pro-longed' instead of 'prolonged', 'emplyees' instead of 'employees', 'beacuse', 'relexed', and 'contibute'. Additionally, collocation errors occur, such as 'intensed competetion' instead of 'intense competition'. These errors do not impede communication since the writer's meaning remains clear, but they prevent the score from reaching a higher band. The lexical range is adequate for the task, fitting the Band 6.0 profile.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, attempting conditional and relative clauses (e.g., 'While, a substantial number of individuals assert that...'). However, grammatical accuracy is inconsistent. There are frequent errors in punctuation, capitalization, and clause structures, such as comma splices and dangling constructions (e.g., 'Hence, by playing sports games, they can...'). Other errors include subject-verb agreement issues like 'longer holiday can provides' and tense inconsistencies. While these errors do not fully obscure the meaning, they occur frequently enough to demonstrate limited control over complex structures, placing the essay firmly at Band 5.5.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.